Mental health

by Russ Roberts on March 2, 2006

in Politics

The Washington Post reports on the sentencing of the corrupt Congressman from California, Randy "Duke" Cuningham:

Former congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.) "bullied and
hectored" Defense Department officials to ensure that two contractors
who were bribing him "received their pound of gold" and profits of up
to 850 percent, federal prosecutors contend in a new court filing that
urges a federal judge to give Cunningham a maximum 10 years in prison
when he is sentenced tomorrow.

But defense attorneys countered in
court documents that Cunningham, 64, is depressed and suicidal and
should receive a six-year term, in recognition of his service as a Navy
pilot who once shot down three enemy planes over North Vietnam in a
single day.

I could see lots of reasons for Cunningham to be depressed and suicidal:

Cunningham resigned from the House after pleading guilty in November to
tax evasion and conspiracy to take $2.4 million in bribes from two
defense contractors and two New York businessmen in return for setting
aside, or earmarking, federal money for them in spending bills.

Stealing oftens yields to remorse.  Getting caught is always bad for one’s mood. 

I know that depression is not the same thing as being in a bad mood.  But the defense claim of depression comes from a psychiatric evaluation paid for by the defense.  I have a feeling it’s not that objective an evaluation.  But it is illuminating nonetheless:

Saul J. Faerstein, a Beverly Hills psychiatrist hired by
Cunningham’s attorneys, concluded after a 5 1/2 -hour examination of
the former House member last month that he "now manifests evidence of a
Major Depressive Disorder with suicidal ideation."

Faerstein
traced many of Cunningham’s physical and mental ailments to his time in
the Navy. For example, injuries sustained when he ejected into the Gulf
of Tonkin after his F-4 fighter jet was hit over North Vietnam in 1972
have left him with "chronic pain and limited mobility," he wrote.
Cunningham also has osteoarthritis and in June 1998 received a
diagnosis of prostate cancer that required surgery and radiation.

OK.  Physical problems from combat, yes.  But where’s the depression come in?

The psychiatrist said Cunningham’s severe depression and anxiety began
in mid-2005 as the corruption investigation closed in on him.

I could see that investigation having a negative impact.  But that’s the old story of the kid who kills his parents and asks for sympathy as an orphan.  The psychiatrist needs a better story to explain the full picture of Cunningham’s mental health.  And surprise!  He finds it:

But he saw its roots in the former congressman’s heroic exploits as a fighter
pilot.

Get that?  The roots of Cunninghams depression and suicidal ideation were planted in Vietnam.  How would that work exactly?

Being "praised and rewarded for his conduct" gave Cunningham "a
sense of omnipotence which was an adaptive psychological defense
mechanism," Faerstein wrote.

Thus Cunningham "came to the job of Congressman with the outsized sense
of ego and a mantel of invulnerability. . . . The process of
rationalizing his behavior blinded him to the corruption it entailed,
and led him to behave in ways totally antithetical to his life
history," the psychiatrist concluded.

A sense of omnipotence?  An outsized sense of ego?  A mantel of invulnerability?  I guess most members of Congress are able to develop "an adaptive psychological defense mechanism" even without fighting in Vietnam.  Or maybe the lesson is that we ought to do a psychiatric profile of politicians before they enter Congress rather than on the way out.

Comments

16 comments    Share Share    Print    Email

{ 8 comments }

doinkicarus March 2, 2006 at 12:44 pm

"…outsized sense of ego and a mantel of invulnerability…"

The same could be said about most serial killers, so do they suggest we ought to be lenient on them, as well?

spencer March 2, 2006 at 2:29 pm

Maybe a more interesting question would be what happened to the defense conractors who bribed him. Aren't they just as guilty of breaking the law as the Congressman?

Mike Z March 2, 2006 at 3:25 pm

The usual excuse seems still handy when one is caught with his pants down: "the devil made me do it!" Not my fault. Hard childhood – no cell phone. I couldn't help it – shot down over Viet Nam. But I needed all those Rolls Royces!

The most leniency I could suggest for him is that they reduce his sentence for any time served as a POW.

Oh. Never mind.

scott March 2, 2006 at 4:01 pm

I am not quite sure what the article could possibly be referring to as "profits up to 850 percent."

Accounting profits are a percentage of revenue. Even if the congressman just gave those firms the contract revenue and there were no expenses, that's 100% profit. We know there were expenses for those firms, the bribes.

Maybe they meant the firms got an 850% return on their bribes, bribe $1MM and get $9.5MM back. In which case it becomes entirely clear that the problem is not the contractors or the politician, it is the fact the the government is far too big, doing far too many projects, and has far too much money to spend.

KF March 2, 2006 at 5:16 pm

*** I am not quite sure what the article could possibly be referring to as "profits up to 850 percent." ***

It means the leading lights of the mainstream press are too stupid to do basic arithmetic. How funny, Steve at Skeptical Optimist posted my comment just yesterday that journalists are too dumb to understand arithmetic. I give you my proof.

There could be such thing as an 850% ROI over time. But that would not described as "profits" for a company doing business — not gross profit or net profit.

If there is some unusual sense in which that statement reflects any truth, obviously that should've been explained. But I guess that weird assertion didn't ring any bells for the MSM geniuses.

KF March 2, 2006 at 6:00 pm

Mystery solved. You can figure this from the article:

The sweetheart Wilkes contract was:

Revenue: 5322 thousand
Costs: 622
Margin: 4700 88%

So WaPo figures 5,322 is about 8.5 times 622, and they call that an 850% "profit". Ha! Even if it's too much to ask that they'd understand that this is an 88% profit margin … a 5,322 result from a 622 investment is about a 750% increase, not 850%.

Good thing the MSM has so many layers of EDITORS. Now we just need some 2nd graders to edit the editors. Nice going WaPo.

Wild Pegasus March 2, 2006 at 6:15 pm

"Once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." – Thomas De Quincey

- Josh

gene berman March 7, 2006 at 9:10 am

Josh/W.P.

I was going to put that up, myself (though I didn't know to whom to attribute–I just generally give Mark Twain credit for those kinds of quotes).

But, I've evidently progressed (or sunk) to the very lowest level–I procrastinated! I'd even put it off until tomorrow but I don't see the point.

Maybe it's a message. If I simply hold off on anything I might do–somebody else will save me the trouble. Actually, I've applied that principle as assiduously as I could manage for almost 70 years. But I've never been what you call perfect at the practice
(and the evidence against me is that I've got grandchildren).

Previous post:

Next post: