Always Low Prices

by Don Boudreaux on December 7, 2006

in Antitrust, Prices, Trade

I love this letter that appears in today’s Wall Street Journal:

I was surprised to learn
from your editorial that Hugo Chávez is allowed to sell oil to Joe
Kennedy’s Citizens Energy Corp. at a 40% discount. Surely a price this
far below market runs afoul of the "antidumping" policies beloved by
many in Mr. Kennedy’s party. Shouldn’t the American public be protected
from lower prices on oil in the same way they’ve been protected from
lower prices on bicycles, frozen concentrated orange juice, tissue
paper, footwear, fishing tackle, hot-rolled carbon steel, televisions,
replacement windshields, shrimp and several hundred other imported
items. If Democrats allow lower prices here, they may even have to
tolerate Wal-Mart.

Bruce E. Ikawa
Professor of Business and Economics Hillsdale College
Hillsdale, Mich.

(Hat tip to Mike LaFaive.)

Comments

{ 8 comments }

Bruce Hall December 7, 2006 at 7:49 pm

Consider the 40% a charitable contribution… like campaign contributions.

johng December 7, 2006 at 10:01 pm

Or taxable imputed income.

John S. December 7, 2006 at 10:03 pm

Consider also that during the recent runup in gas prices, two gas stations in Colorado were charged with violating something called the "Unfair Practices Act" for selling gasoline at prices below the market value.

Bob Smith December 8, 2006 at 12:58 am

Is it just me, or does that discount smack of a possible bribe, considering who Joe is related to? I would think that such a "gift" to anybody that closely related to a major US political figure would be the subject of an intense investigation.

Chris Meisenzahl December 8, 2006 at 6:47 am

Fantastic point.

Josh December 8, 2006 at 8:07 am

Haha! I love it!

Sound economic logic AND a jab at the Kennedys… it's got it all.

Ray G December 9, 2006 at 2:11 pm

Zing!

And it is much more akin to a bribe than charity, though I suppose any bribe could be considered charity if looked at in the "correct" light.

Joe Blalock December 11, 2006 at 10:24 am

Consider if the US government gave a commodity (wheat we purchased from farmers) to a prominent politician in, say, Nigeria, and said politician ran TV ads touting cheap wheat and saying call 1-800-ABU-DADA. Whould not we be accused of interfering with the internal politics of Nigeria? What if Abu Dada was considering a run for political office after an absence to rehabilitate himself. Or is this a bribe to Abu Dada's province where his Uncle Abu Tedu is a powerful senator and his allies Abu Dodd and Abu Barney wil also benefit?

I think the administration/State department should put the kabosh of Citco Joe's little game but they don't have the stones to do it.

Previous post:

Next post: