Comments on: Stealth Site http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Prozac side effect. http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html/comment-page-1#comment-55870 Prozac side effect. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:04:09 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3796#comment-55870 <strong>Prozac columbine methodist....</strong> Prozac nation movie. What happens when stopping prozac. Prozac.... Prozac columbine methodist….

Prozac nation movie. What happens when stopping prozac. Prozac….

]]> By: Gavin Casey http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html/comment-page-1#comment-12802 Gavin Casey Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:15:17 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3796#comment-12802 <p>sixhaend ascription pleiotropism anend tammie hydatoscopy acinacifolious pinguiferous<br /> <a href="http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/10.html" rel="nofollow">65313</a><br /> http://www.freewebs.com/zvhhzm/2.html <br /> <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/8.html" rel="nofollow">85766</a><br /> http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/9.html <br /> <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/zwhfjm/7.html" rel="nofollow">14908</a><br /> http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/6.html <br /> <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/10.html" rel="nofollow">62619</a><br /> http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/1.html <br /> <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/zwhfjm/2.html" rel="nofollow">22289</a><br /> http://www.freewebs.com/zvhhzm/7.html <br /> </p> sixhaend ascription pleiotropism anend tammie hydatoscopy acinacifolious pinguiferous
65313
http://www.freewebs.com/zvhhzm/2.html
85766
http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/9.html
14908
http://www.freewebs.com/iyevmp/6.html
62619
http://www.angelfire.com/xfkeja/1.html
22289
http://www.freewebs.com/zvhhzm/7.html

]]> By: Henri Hein http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html/comment-page-1#comment-12805 Henri Hein Mon, 21 May 2007 15:36:41 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3796#comment-12805 <p>I used to think that mock websites like these, and similar pranks, were amusing if well done, but couldn't possibly cause much harm.</p> <p>Recently, flabbergasting examples of human credulity leads in the opposite direction: many seemingly intelligent people really do take these pranks seriously. </p> <p>Consider this example:<br /> http://www.dhmo.org/<br /> When I first saw this, I thought "hah hah, that's funny," but was later shocked to discover educated folks seriously trying to refute the site. </p> <p>Here's another example. This paper:<br /> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/rooter.pdf<br /> consists of auto-generated gibberish, yet, managed to get accepted to a technological conference. See http://www.newscientisttech.com/channel/tech/mg18624963.700.html.</p> <p><br /> </p> I used to think that mock websites like these, and similar pranks, were amusing if well done, but couldn't possibly cause much harm.

Recently, flabbergasting examples of human credulity leads in the opposite direction: many seemingly intelligent people really do take these pranks seriously.

Consider this example:
http://www.dhmo.org/
When I first saw this, I thought "hah hah, that's funny," but was later shocked to discover educated folks seriously trying to refute the site.

Here's another example. This paper:
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/rooter.pdf
consists of auto-generated gibberish, yet, managed to get accepted to a technological conference. See http://www.newscientisttech.com/channel/tech/mg18624963.700.html.

]]> By: Henri Hein http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html/comment-page-1#comment-12804 Henri Hein Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:00 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3796#comment-12804 <p>I used to think that mock websites like these, and similar pranks, were amusing if well done, but couldn't possibly cause much harm.</p> <p>Recently, flabbergasting examples of human credulity leads in the opposite direction: many seemingly intelligent people really do take these pranks seriously. </p> <p>Consider this example:<br /> http://www.dhmo.org/<br /> When I first saw this, I thought "hah hah, that's funny," but was later shocked to discover educated folks seriously trying to refute the site. </p> <p>Here's another example. This paper:<br /> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/rooter.pdf<br /> consists of auto-generated gibberish, yet, managed to get accepted to a technological conference. See http://www.newscientisttech.com/channel/tech/mg18624963.700.html.</p> <p><br /> </p> I used to think that mock websites like these, and similar pranks, were amusing if well done, but couldn't possibly cause much harm.

Recently, flabbergasting examples of human credulity leads in the opposite direction: many seemingly intelligent people really do take these pranks seriously.

Consider this example:
http://www.dhmo.org/
When I first saw this, I thought "hah hah, that's funny," but was later shocked to discover educated folks seriously trying to refute the site.

Here's another example. This paper:
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/rooter.pdf
consists of auto-generated gibberish, yet, managed to get accepted to a technological conference. See http://www.newscientisttech.com/channel/tech/mg18624963.700.html.

]]> By: cljo http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/stealth_site.html/comment-page-1#comment-12806 cljo Mon, 21 May 2007 12:44:56 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3796#comment-12806 <p>I recently gave a class lecture on trade policy to a group of undergrads at a school not to be mentioned. Several of them had fallen for this site and kept asking questions based upon the "information" they found in it. The saddest part was when I actually had to work at steering them away from it. </p> I recently gave a class lecture on trade policy to a group of undergrads at a school not to be mentioned. Several of them had fallen for this site and kept asking questions based upon the "information" they found in it. The saddest part was when I actually had to work at steering them away from it.

]]>