<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Note on Income Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levitra online consultation us.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/comment-page-1#comment-55641</link>
		<dc:creator>Levitra online consultation us.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3579#comment-55641</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Levitra cialis viagra comparison....&lt;/strong&gt;

Which is more effective viagra cialas levitra....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Levitra cialis viagra comparison&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Which is more effective viagra cialas levitra&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dewey</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/comment-page-1#comment-17546</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3579#comment-17546</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mr. Reynolds,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After reading your comment, I quickly followed the link and carefully read &quot;The Truth About the Top 1%&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you for writing this piece.  I&#039;ve long understood that income distribution arguments ignored non-taxable transfers.  But I had forgotten that tax-deferred savings would also be excluded.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Before reading your editorial, I hadn&#039;t realized the significant shift of business income from corporate to personal tax returns.  That was illuminating.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m going to summarize your editorial into a very brief layman&#039;s version.  The next time my local Dallas or Fort Worth paper mentions &quot;increasing income inequality&quot;, I&#039;ll be ready with a Letter to the Editor.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Reynolds,</p>
<p>After reading your comment, I quickly followed the link and carefully read &quot;The Truth About the Top 1%&quot;.</p>
<p>Thank you for writing this piece.  I&#39;ve long understood that income distribution arguments ignored non-taxable transfers.  But I had forgotten that tax-deferred savings would also be excluded.  </p>
<p>Before reading your editorial, I hadn&#39;t realized the significant shift of business income from corporate to personal tax returns.  That was illuminating.</p>
<p>I&#39;m going to summarize your editorial into a very brief layman&#39;s version.  The next time my local Dallas or Fort Worth paper mentions &quot;increasing income inequality&quot;, I&#39;ll be ready with a Letter to the Editor.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/comment-page-1#comment-17545</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3579#comment-17545</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My WSJ article spoke of the &quot;indivdiual income tax&quot; (and shifting in and out of the corporate tax), but was very explicit in saying the data referred to tax returns, not households, and that top quintile taxpayers average two salaries per joint return.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the letter made a &quot;good point&quot; it was not a good point about anything I wrote.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My WSJ article spoke of the &quot;indivdiual income tax&quot; (and shifting in and out of the corporate tax), but was very explicit in saying the data referred to tax returns, not households, and that top quintile taxpayers average two salaries per joint return.</p>
<p>If the letter made a &quot;good point&quot; it was not a good point about anything I wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dewey</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/comment-page-1#comment-17544</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3579#comment-17544</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;vidyohs,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for that Ayn Rand quote.  I had never before read that.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vidyohs,</p>
<p>Thanks for that Ayn Rand quote.  I had never before read that.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/11/a-note-on-incom.html/comment-page-1#comment-17575</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3579#comment-17575</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Strange doin&#039;s can happen inside these little machines, eh holymoly? :-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Whether Sir Galt finds me or not will never affect what is in my stocking, my friend. I long ago understood that if my stocking was going to have something in it, it would be me that put it there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the same Rand-ian theme, I have adopted her response to a questioner who challenged her after a lecture, and I now preach that wisdom as my own.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Her questioner asked, &quot;But, Miss Rand, what do we do about the poor?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;She replied, &quot;Don&#039;t be one.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s it in a nutshell, don&#039;t be one, and spread that wisdom to others, don&#039;t be one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is always a way for those who look.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange doin&#39;s can happen inside these little machines, eh holymoly? <img src='http://cafehayek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Whether Sir Galt finds me or not will never affect what is in my stocking, my friend. I long ago understood that if my stocking was going to have something in it, it would be me that put it there.</p>
<p>On the same Rand-ian theme, I have adopted her response to a questioner who challenged her after a lecture, and I now preach that wisdom as my own.</p>
<p>Her questioner asked, &quot;But, Miss Rand, what do we do about the poor?&quot;</p>
<p>She replied, &quot;Don&#39;t be one.&quot;</p>
<p>That&#39;s it in a nutshell, don&#39;t be one, and spread that wisdom to others, don&#39;t be one.</p>
<p>There is always a way for those who look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

