<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hooray for America&#039;s Trade Deficit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cialis.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/comment-page-2#comment-55692</link>
		<dc:creator>Cialis.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3356#comment-55692</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Buy cialis....&lt;/strong&gt;

Cialis best price buy online. Cialis. Cialis and drug craving....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Buy cialis&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Cialis best price buy online. Cialis. Cialis and drug craving&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Python</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/comment-page-1#comment-23306</link>
		<dc:creator>Python</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3356#comment-23306</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Muirgeo,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the trade deficit is less than $1 per square meter of land. But soon it may surpass that level. What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Area of land in square meters = 148,326,000,000,000 or 148 trillion square meters of land on Earth. Trade deficit is less than $1 trillion. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh wait, you said it would be 148 trillion people on earth, that&#039;s right. And you defended your statement twice. Brilliant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Muirgeo,</p>
<p>I think the trade deficit is less than $1 per square meter of land. But soon it may surpass that level. What do you think?</p>
<p>Area of land in square meters = 148,326,000,000,000 or 148 trillion square meters of land on Earth. Trade deficit is less than $1 trillion. </p>
<p>Oh wait, you said it would be 148 trillion people on earth, that&#39;s right. And you defended your statement twice. Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muirgeo</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/comment-page-1#comment-23305</link>
		<dc:creator>muirgeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3356#comment-23305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Many of the things I believe would weaken the government not strengthen it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No way. There&#039;s no way in hell that you wrote that and believe this. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Posted by: lowcountryjoe &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
LCJ,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Would you say that George W Bush has opened up our government? Would you agree he has concentrated the power of the executive in a significant way. Now of course I hate the man with passion but my argument is easily generalized&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; If it was up to me the day Obama becomes president I would want every official communication he makes to be recored and posted real time for all to see. No private meetings concerning our governance except for the most secure of issues. This would go for every government official/ I&#039;d hold them to the highest of scrutiny and punish them severely when they abused the public trust. They&#039;d not get to classify every single document they want. I make a system where whistle blowers would be free to have instant access to a public broadcast real time to air issues of abuse. They would get to choose WHICH press people and when they get to answer questions. There would be regular press briefings and the questions would come from all the people of this country.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea that a guy like Dick Cheney could hold our energy policy meeting in private is absurd beyond belief. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With out a doubt by my rules the governments power and ability to be bought would be markedly decreased. And even though I might support greater degrees of public service and support for proven things like early child education and health care the system would be so efficient and transparent it would be easily supported and would ultimately be a boom to our economy by maximizing the greatest resource of all....human capital. The current system is very uncompetitive and artificial... oligarchic indeed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the things I believe would weaken the government not strengthen it.</p>
<p>No way. There&#39;s no way in hell that you wrote that and believe this. </p>
<p>Posted by: lowcountryjoe </p>
<p>
LCJ,</p>
<p>
Would you say that George W Bush has opened up our government? Would you agree he has concentrated the power of the executive in a significant way. Now of course I hate the man with passion but my argument is easily generalized</p>
<p> If it was up to me the day Obama becomes president I would want every official communication he makes to be recored and posted real time for all to see. No private meetings concerning our governance except for the most secure of issues. This would go for every government official/ I&#39;d hold them to the highest of scrutiny and punish them severely when they abused the public trust. They&#39;d not get to classify every single document they want. I make a system where whistle blowers would be free to have instant access to a public broadcast real time to air issues of abuse. They would get to choose WHICH press people and when they get to answer questions. There would be regular press briefings and the questions would come from all the people of this country.</p>
<p>The idea that a guy like Dick Cheney could hold our energy policy meeting in private is absurd beyond belief. </p>
<p>With out a doubt by my rules the governments power and ability to be bought would be markedly decreased. And even though I might support greater degrees of public service and support for proven things like early child education and health care the system would be so efficient and transparent it would be easily supported and would ultimately be a boom to our economy by maximizing the greatest resource of all&#8230;.human capital. The current system is very uncompetitive and artificial&#8230; oligarchic indeed.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Brock</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/comment-page-1#comment-23304</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3356#comment-23304</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Capital is defined as &quot;cash or assets capable of producing future income.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s definitely not how I define the word.  Capital is a real means of production.  Cash is an accounting device, a ledger entry, a credit, an entitlement to purchase things, including real means of production.  Confusing cash with capital is a capital mistake, because monetary authorities can create as much cash as they like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Capital is defined as &quot;cash or assets capable of producing future income.&quot;
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#39;s definitely not how I define the word.  Capital is a real means of production.  Cash is an accounting device, a ledger entry, a credit, an entitlement to purchase things, including real means of production.  Confusing cash with capital is a capital mistake, because monetary authorities can create as much cash as they like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Hodak</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/03/hooray-for-amer.html/comment-page-1#comment-23303</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Hodak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3356#comment-23303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We&#039;ve all been muirgeo&#039;d.  Why do we persist in punching at the fog?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve all been muirgeo&#39;d.  Why do we persist in punching at the fog?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

