Comments on: Benedict and Lou http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html where orders emerge Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:50:36 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Initial effects of propecia. http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-55802 Initial effects of propecia. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:06:03 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-55802 <strong>Liquid propecia....</strong> Propecia. Propecia side effects bad. Propecia generic. Natural herb reverse impotence from propecia. Propecia online uk. Propecia contraindications. Propecia post side effect.... Liquid propecia….

Propecia. Propecia side effects bad. Propecia generic. Natural herb reverse impotence from propecia. Propecia online uk. Propecia contraindications. Propecia post side effect….

]]> By: Tempra soma. http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-55587 Tempra soma. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:45:48 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-55587 <strong>Soma....</strong> Soma to florida.... Soma….

Soma to florida….

]]> By: ATaylor http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25146 ATaylor Thu, 15 May 2008 15:06:42 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25146 <p>Consider this: Illegally entering the US requires that the individual (1) subject themselves to mortal risk, (2) bring only what they can carry, and (3) in the case of a Mexico/US border crossing, part with considerable wealth to pay a "coyote". These costs are not very different from those faced by the waves of European migrants in 1900. What I suggest is that they are, De facto, a filter in so much as the less industrious are not likely to take this route. Rather they would be far more likely to try the course of legal migration, which requires that the individual submit paperwork and have the good fortune of winning the lottery. </p> <p>The caveat: The benefit should be, as it was in 1900, the opportunity to be rewarded for hard work. If however, the expected benefit is receiving government handouts, then all bets are off.</p> Consider this: Illegally entering the US requires that the individual (1) subject themselves to mortal risk, (2) bring only what they can carry, and (3) in the case of a Mexico/US border crossing, part with considerable wealth to pay a "coyote". These costs are not very different from those faced by the waves of European migrants in 1900. What I suggest is that they are, De facto, a filter in so much as the less industrious are not likely to take this route. Rather they would be far more likely to try the course of legal migration, which requires that the individual submit paperwork and have the good fortune of winning the lottery.

The caveat: The benefit should be, as it was in 1900, the opportunity to be rewarded for hard work. If however, the expected benefit is receiving government handouts, then all bets are off.

]]> By: Sarah http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25145 Sarah Sun, 11 May 2008 11:34:42 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25145 <p>"If we want to hire - or to befriend, or to live with, or simply to enjoy as neighbors - non-Americans in our own hometowns, you rudely tell us that we should not be allowed to do so."</p> <p>I don't get this. Fine, befriend, live with and "enjoy" illegal aliens in your home town. Just don't break the law by hiring them.</p> <p>And what do you mean, "freedom of association... this important freedom" ? I didn't realize associating with criminals is an important right that a tv anchor should not speak about negatively.</p> <p>In this case I agree with Lou Dobbs, And btw, the only people I know who "enjoy" illegal immigration in their hometowns are ones who are making money off of them.</p> "If we want to hire – or to befriend, or to live with, or simply to enjoy as neighbors – non-Americans in our own hometowns, you rudely tell us that we should not be allowed to do so."

I don't get this. Fine, befriend, live with and "enjoy" illegal aliens in your home town. Just don't break the law by hiring them.

And what do you mean, "freedom of association… this important freedom" ? I didn't realize associating with criminals is an important right that a tv anchor should not speak about negatively.

In this case I agree with Lou Dobbs, And btw, the only people I know who "enjoy" illegal immigration in their hometowns are ones who are making money off of them.

]]> By: scottynx http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25144 scottynx Thu, 01 May 2008 21:16:30 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25144 <p>49.9 percent of hispanic births are illegitimate. </p> 49.9 percent of hispanic births are illegitimate.

]]> By: Josh Nankivel http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25143 Josh Nankivel Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:12:42 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25143 <p>Amen. </p> Amen.

]]> By: Mr. Econotarian http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25142 Mr. Econotarian Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:26:03 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25142 <p>Forget religion and guns, getting a CNN show makes you bitter (Dobbs/Beck)...</p> Forget religion and guns, getting a CNN show makes you bitter (Dobbs/Beck)…

]]> By: Keith http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25141 Keith Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:07:57 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25141 <p>"I've wondered for a long time how Lou Dobbs gets away with mis-informing the American public."</p> <p>Like any elitist spouting dogma he expects everybody to accept it on faith (much like the Pope himself). Neither seem to be wanting for followers. </p> "I've wondered for a long time how Lou Dobbs gets away with mis-informing the American public."

Like any elitist spouting dogma he expects everybody to accept it on faith (much like the Pope himself). Neither seem to be wanting for followers.

]]> By: Matt http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25140 Matt Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:24:23 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25140 <p>Tancredo and Dobbs lie in wait for the Pope to say that we, in particular, have a duty toward immigration. That, of course, would be market inefficient and rejected by Hayek.</p> <p>The Pope did not say that, as near as I can tell, the Pope simply stated what the Catholic Church recommends to all world bishops what his estimation of labor utility.</p> <p>But, the point remains, over what integration period did the Pope calculate the utility of immigration, because I remember times when immigrant utility approached zero in some parts of the globe, and the Pope had better make sure his economics is correct.</p> <p>Remember, if the Pope is procyclical in his utility estimation, then more immigrants will suffer, not less, over some period of the cycle.</p> <p><br /> </p> Tancredo and Dobbs lie in wait for the Pope to say that we, in particular, have a duty toward immigration. That, of course, would be market inefficient and rejected by Hayek.

The Pope did not say that, as near as I can tell, the Pope simply stated what the Catholic Church recommends to all world bishops what his estimation of labor utility.

But, the point remains, over what integration period did the Pope calculate the utility of immigration, because I remember times when immigrant utility approached zero in some parts of the globe, and the Pope had better make sure his economics is correct.

Remember, if the Pope is procyclical in his utility estimation, then more immigrants will suffer, not less, over some period of the cycle.

]]> By: John Dewey http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25139 John Dewey Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:49:20 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25139 <p>I've wondered for a long time how Lou Dobbs gets away with mis-informing the American public. One would think that rival networks would take him on. My guess is that Dobbs' message is welcomed by union-funded liberals as well as by conservative commentators who thrive by generating fear of Asians and Latinos. </p> <p>Yeah, I think it is racism that motivates conservative demagogues. I don't remember Perot and Buchanan objecting to the U.S.-Canada free trade agreement of 1988. Dobbs does not object to European investment in U.S. equities, just investment by Asians or by our Middle East allies.<br /> </p> I've wondered for a long time how Lou Dobbs gets away with mis-informing the American public. One would think that rival networks would take him on. My guess is that Dobbs' message is welcomed by union-funded liberals as well as by conservative commentators who thrive by generating fear of Asians and Latinos.

Yeah, I think it is racism that motivates conservative demagogues. I don't remember Perot and Buchanan objecting to the U.S.-Canada free trade agreement of 1988. Dobbs does not object to European investment in U.S. equities, just investment by Asians or by our Middle East allies.

]]> By: The Dirty Mac http://cafehayek.com/2008/04/benedict-and-lo.html/comment-page-1#comment-25138 The Dirty Mac Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:33:13 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3300#comment-25138 <p>Lou Dobbs came to speak in my town, taking a job away from a local xenophobic speaker.</p> Lou Dobbs came to speak in my town, taking a job away from a local xenophobic speaker.

]]>