Carpe Diem’s Mark Perry carefully investigates and clearly explains — much better than I do here — the likely source of Paul Krugman’s mistaken claim, in yesterday’s New York Times, that "the percentage of prime-working-age Americans without jobs . . . is historically high."
Mark reached the same conclusion that I reached: Krugman mistook "men" for "all workers."
Using what is likely the same data source used (but carelessly so) by Krugman — and looking at the jobless rates of both men and women — Mark concludes
Krugman
says "the percentage of prime-working-age Americans without jobs is
historically high," which is clearly not accurate. It would be more
accurate to say that it is close to being historically low.



Podcast RSS Feed
Full EconTalk Text











