<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Women and Assets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levitra viagra cyalis webmd comparisons.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/comment-page-1#comment-55726</link>
		<dc:creator>Levitra viagra cyalis webmd comparisons.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3239#comment-55726</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Seratim levitra pe....&lt;/strong&gt;

Levitra....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seratim levitra pe&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Levitra&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cialis.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/comment-page-1#comment-55558</link>
		<dc:creator>Cialis.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3239#comment-55558</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cialis....&lt;/strong&gt;

Link buy cialis online. Cialis....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cialis&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Link buy cialis online. Cialis&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Methinks</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/comment-page-1#comment-26305</link>
		<dc:creator>Methinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3239#comment-26305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;i&gt;I offer a different reason: women are more decent than men....&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;women are less willing than men to perform the countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering necessary to win political office.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HA!  BS, Professor.  Obviously, as a man, you&#039;re not in the inner circle of women.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Women (if you&#039;ll pardon my generalizing, I&#039;ll pardon yours) are all about politics.  I&#039;ve rarely met a woman who says what she means and means what she says.  They are masters of soul-shriveling pandering and asinine [political] stunts.  I&#039;ve never been in more treacherous waters than sitting in a circle of women.  Women are mean girls.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is why I prefer to work in with men in a male dominated industry. Men are aggressive but straight forward and I would trust my husband, my male friends and colleagues before almost any of the women that I know.  And I am as rare a woman as a woman in politics - I am a female trader.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please don&#039;t make sweeping asinine generalizations about the purity of women&#039;s souls.  For one thing, women are individuals.  Some of us are decent and some are b*tches.  The reason more women don&#039;t go into trading, politics and other aggressive, male dominated professions are varied.  The biggest reason is that these careers demand so much time and energy that they are not conducive to pregnancy (bearing children is physically difficult and dangerous).  Often, women choose family over career if the career interferes too much.  So, they tend to either drop or stay away from careers that are too demanding not because of decency but for practical reasons.  Make no mistake, though, women are masters of politics.  If they weren&#039;t master manipulators, how would you explain your impression that us (or is it &quot;we&quot;?) girls are all sweetness and decency?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <i>I offer a different reason: women are more decent than men&#8230;.</i></p>
<p>women are less willing than men to perform the countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering necessary to win political office.</p>
<p>HA!  BS, Professor.  Obviously, as a man, you&#39;re not in the inner circle of women.  </p>
<p>Women (if you&#39;ll pardon my generalizing, I&#39;ll pardon yours) are all about politics.  I&#39;ve rarely met a woman who says what she means and means what she says.  They are masters of soul-shriveling pandering and asinine [political] stunts.  I&#39;ve never been in more treacherous waters than sitting in a circle of women.  Women are mean girls.</p>
<p>This is why I prefer to work in with men in a male dominated industry. Men are aggressive but straight forward and I would trust my husband, my male friends and colleagues before almost any of the women that I know.  And I am as rare a woman as a woman in politics &#8211; I am a female trader.</p>
<p>Please don&#39;t make sweeping asinine generalizations about the purity of women&#39;s souls.  For one thing, women are individuals.  Some of us are decent and some are b*tches.  The reason more women don&#39;t go into trading, politics and other aggressive, male dominated professions are varied.  The biggest reason is that these careers demand so much time and energy that they are not conducive to pregnancy (bearing children is physically difficult and dangerous).  Often, women choose family over career if the career interferes too much.  So, they tend to either drop or stay away from careers that are too demanding not because of decency but for practical reasons.  Make no mistake, though, women are masters of politics.  If they weren&#39;t master manipulators, how would you explain your impression that us (or is it &quot;we&quot;?) girls are all sweetness and decency?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian-NJ</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/comment-page-1#comment-26304</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian-NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3239#comment-26304</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;women are less willing than men to perform the countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering necessary to win political office.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well this is smoke blowing out your a$$, I disagree with this statement, while I may not disagree with the fact there are fewer woman in politics, I certainly wouldn&#039;t site this as a reason. I will assume this was a humorless joke.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;women are less willing than men to perform the countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering necessary to win political office.&quot;</p>
<p>Well this is smoke blowing out your a$$, I disagree with this statement, while I may not disagree with the fact there are fewer woman in politics, I certainly wouldn&#39;t site this as a reason. I will assume this was a humorless joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reginald musgrave</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/on-women-and-as.html/comment-page-1#comment-26303</link>
		<dc:creator>reginald musgrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3239#comment-26303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Doesn&#039;t the booming porno industry belie the claim that in general women are reluctant to perform &quot;countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering&quot;? Maybe the money&#039;s just not good enough in politics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#39;t the booming porno industry belie the claim that in general women are reluctant to perform &quot;countless asinine stunts and soul-shriveling pandering&quot;? Maybe the money&#39;s just not good enough in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

