Comments on: Perspective http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Cialis. http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-55722 Cialis. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:11:53 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3270#comment-55722 <strong>Cialis....</strong> Cialis online. Dangers cialis and cocaine. Cialis and levitra. Cialis and drug craving. Cialis.... Cialis….

Cialis online. Dangers cialis and cocaine. Cialis and levitra. Cialis and drug craving. Cialis….

]]> By: Using cialis. http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-55550 Using cialis. Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:30:16 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3270#comment-55550 <strong>Cialis and drug craving....</strong> Cialis american pharmacy. Cheapest cialis. Taking viagra with cialis. Metaprolol cialis. Cialis effects. Cialis.... Cialis and drug craving….

Cialis american pharmacy. Cheapest cialis. Taking viagra with cialis. Metaprolol cialis. Cialis effects. Cialis….

]]> By: brotio http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-25788 brotio Fri, 16 May 2008 02:28:02 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3270#comment-25788 <p>"As for PATCO, I'm aware of the use of the law, even if enforcing it had unintended side effect. I thought it was enacted as a reaction to mass strikes - with an overriden veto by Truman." - sethstorm</p> <p>You may be correct. But I think we both agree that there is a law prohibiting Federal employees from striking.</p> <p><br /> "On offshoring/inshoring, it has to be viewed as something that is not economic invasion, but as a better product/service. For that, I can only speak of my short experiences with Toyota and Honda(which does have a factory north of the Mason-Dixon)."</p> <p>I don't understand what you're getting at here. Is your statement implying that if Dell feels they can provide me with a better product by building their computers in Mexico; and provide better service by employing Indians (Asia) for tech support that they should be free to do so? Your previous posts seem to argue in favor of protectionism, which seems inconsistent with how I'm understanding your quoted statement. </p> <p>I am interested in your experiences with Toyota and Honda. Please elaborate? Thanks.<br /> </p> "As for PATCO, I'm aware of the use of the law, even if enforcing it had unintended side effect. I thought it was enacted as a reaction to mass strikes – with an overriden veto by Truman." – sethstorm

You may be correct. But I think we both agree that there is a law prohibiting Federal employees from striking.

"On offshoring/inshoring, it has to be viewed as something that is not economic invasion, but as a better product/service. For that, I can only speak of my short experiences with Toyota and Honda(which does have a factory north of the Mason-Dixon)."

I don't understand what you're getting at here. Is your statement implying that if Dell feels they can provide me with a better product by building their computers in Mexico; and provide better service by employing Indians (Asia) for tech support that they should be free to do so? Your previous posts seem to argue in favor of protectionism, which seems inconsistent with how I'm understanding your quoted statement.

I am interested in your experiences with Toyota and Honda. Please elaborate? Thanks.

]]> By: brotio http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-25787 brotio Fri, 16 May 2008 01:01:17 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3270#comment-25787 <p>John Dewey, RE: your post of May 15, 2008 11:09:45 AM.</p> <p>Thanks for saying so succinctly the point I was trying to make. I don't disagree with a thing you said.</p> John Dewey, RE: your post of May 15, 2008 11:09:45 AM.

Thanks for saying so succinctly the point I was trying to make. I don't disagree with a thing you said.

]]> By: sethstorm http://cafehayek.com/2008/05/perspective.html/comment-page-1#comment-25786 sethstorm Thu, 15 May 2008 14:01:42 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3270#comment-25786 <p><i><br /> No. I'm saying that limiting government's ability to give unions and businesses the favors they seek would limit their influence WITHOUT pandering to either group and would force both to succeed or fail in the marketplace. </i></p> <p>Ok. If you insist on using the market message, fine. But that is one point I will accept.</p> <p>As for PATCO, I'm aware of the use of the law, even if enforcing it had unintended side effect. I thought it was enacted as a reaction to mass strikes - with an overriden veto by Truman.</p> <p>On offshoring/inshoring, it has to be viewed as something that is not economic invasion, but as a better product/service. For that, I can only speak of my short experiences with Toyota and Honda(which does have a factory north of the Mason-Dixon). </p>
No. I'm saying that limiting government's ability to give unions and businesses the favors they seek would limit their influence WITHOUT pandering to either group and would force both to succeed or fail in the marketplace.

Ok. If you insist on using the market message, fine. But that is one point I will accept.

As for PATCO, I'm aware of the use of the law, even if enforcing it had unintended side effect. I thought it was enacted as a reaction to mass strikes – with an overriden veto by Truman.

On offshoring/inshoring, it has to be viewed as something that is not economic invasion, but as a better product/service. For that, I can only speak of my short experiences with Toyota and Honda(which does have a factory north of the Mason-Dixon).

]]>