Comments on: Situational Ethics http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: lowcountryjoe http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html/comment-page-1#comment-27069 lowcountryjoe Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:04:11 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3208#comment-27069 <p>Yep, yawn. That's pretty much how I feel every time you seek to inject your religious views of all things evnvironmental, with most of mankind being sinners. I'm tired of the homilies, Gil; you're bringing your church to us and it's causing my sleepiness.</p> Yep, yawn. That's pretty much how I feel every time you seek to inject your religious views of all things evnvironmental, with most of mankind being sinners. I'm tired of the homilies, Gil; you're bringing your church to us and it's causing my sleepiness.

]]> By: Gil http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html/comment-page-1#comment-27068 Gil Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:32:48 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3208#comment-27068 <p>*YAWN!* X0</p> *YAWN!* X0

]]> By: lowcountryjoe http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html/comment-page-1#comment-27067 lowcountryjoe Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:00:27 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3208#comment-27067 <p>Yes, Gil, we got that when we read you crying <i>fowl</i> the first time. It's entirely likely that your pressing question will be <i>duck</i>ed again.</p> <p>Have you been to see The Wonderful Wizard yet?</p> Yes, Gil, we got that when we read you crying fowl the first time. It's entirely likely that your pressing question will be ducked again.

Have you been to see The Wonderful Wizard yet?

]]> By: Gil http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html/comment-page-1#comment-27066 Gil Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:06:51 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3208#comment-27066 <p>Actually my original question is what could poor pigeons do to a tennis match that they to be shot? It's not quite a 'it's not hurting anyone' scenario here.</p> Actually my original question is what could poor pigeons do to a tennis match that they to be shot? It's not quite a 'it's not hurting anyone' scenario here.

]]> By: lowcountyjoe http://cafehayek.com/2008/06/situational-eth.html/comment-page-1#comment-27065 lowcountyjoe Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:40:27 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3208#comment-27065 <p><i>Could you seriously compare Marxism and Darwinism LCJ!?!?!?! 8( Darwinism is what the free market is all about - making sure the best succeed and the worst fall off the end.</i></p> <p>No, seriously I didn't. It was meant as a parody. And oh yes, the free market is all about getting what you can by crapping all over those people around you who can exploited. That's why none of what takes place within the markets is cooperative and volunatry...it's just shrewd people taking advantage of one another at the expense of everyone involved. This is why there's no satisfaction -- ever! -- and NO ONE keeps cooperative partnerships and comes to agreements. I think we're best served if governmet takes over the role of mediator -- in EVERY transaction -- so that we can finally negotiate with each other and progress (COLLECTIVELY).</p> <p>And if the worst are falling off the end, I propose that we flip the scenario on its head and reward the worst and punish the best because it sounds like such a good idea. Oh, wait...we're already kind of doing this. Should we just <a href="http://www.buildingbrands.com/didyouknow/16_avis_we_try_harder.php" rel="nofollow">AVIS</a> this then..."yes we can!"</p> Could you seriously compare Marxism and Darwinism LCJ!?!?!?! 8( Darwinism is what the free market is all about – making sure the best succeed and the worst fall off the end.

No, seriously I didn't. It was meant as a parody. And oh yes, the free market is all about getting what you can by crapping all over those people around you who can exploited. That's why none of what takes place within the markets is cooperative and volunatry…it's just shrewd people taking advantage of one another at the expense of everyone involved. This is why there's no satisfaction — ever! — and NO ONE keeps cooperative partnerships and comes to agreements. I think we're best served if governmet takes over the role of mediator — in EVERY transaction — so that we can finally negotiate with each other and progress (COLLECTIVELY).

And if the worst are falling off the end, I propose that we flip the scenario on its head and reward the worst and punish the best because it sounds like such a good idea. Oh, wait…we're already kind of doing this. Should we just AVIS this then…"yes we can!"

]]>