One of the most disingenuous arguments that Members of Congress trot out in defense of earmarks is that such pork really reflects each Member’s unique knowledge of the special needs of his or her constituents. My and Karol’s good friend Frayda Levin sees through this silly argument, as explained here by Paul Jacobs. Here’s the heart:
Like all sensible taxpayers, Frayda opposes Congress’s corrupt earmark
culture, whereby congressmen use our tax dollars to fund their personal
favor factories. Recently, she wrote to New Jersey Senator Robert
Menendez asking him to support a legislative moratorium on earmarks.
Instead,
Senator Menendez wrote back defending his support for earmarked pork.
“While our federal agencies implement programs from Washington,” he
countered, “they often do not understand the unique needs of the
communities and the states.”
When Frayda responded to Senator
Menendez, she pointed out how completely ludicrous it was to “send
money to D.C.” and “then have to spend resources finding a sympathetic
ear, who can, as you note, understand local needs.”
Go Frayda!
Share
Podcast RSS Feed
Full EconTalk Text
