<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Budgets Have Two Sides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/comment-page-1#comment-30063</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3057#comment-30063</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Morgan, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Those stats are amazing.  Thanks for sharing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan, </p>
<p>Those stats are amazing.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/comment-page-1#comment-30062</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3057#comment-30062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Total government tax receipts (2008; tax foundation): $3.91 Trillion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Number of full-time workers in the U.S. (2007; BLS): 121 million&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Taxes collected per full-time worker: $32,300&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And we need more tax revenue?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total government tax receipts (2008; tax foundation): $3.91 Trillion.</p>
<p>Number of full-time workers in the U.S. (2007; BLS): 121 million</p>
<p>Taxes collected per full-time worker: $32,300</p>
<p>And we need more tax revenue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/comment-page-1#comment-30053</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3057#comment-30053</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Gary,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re correct of course. The solution I spoke of is just the first half of the equation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The second half is a tad more confrontational.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>You&#39;re correct of course. The solution I spoke of is just the first half of the equation.</p>
<p>The second half is a tad more confrontational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/comment-page-1#comment-30061</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3057#comment-30061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Vidyohs,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I generally agree... they spend it even if we don&#039;t give it to them... hence the $9 Trillion federal debt, plus another $75 Trillion or so in unfunded liabilities.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it&#039;s only a hundred billion. It&#039;s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
- Richard Feynman &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vidyohs,</p>
<p>While I generally agree&#8230; they spend it even if we don&#39;t give it to them&#8230; hence the $9 Trillion federal debt, plus another $75 Trillion or so in unfunded liabilities.  </p>
<p>&quot;There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it&#39;s only a hundred billion. It&#39;s less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.&quot;<br />
- Richard Feynman </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2008/09/budgets-have-tw.html/comment-page-1#comment-30054</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=3057#comment-30054</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you give it to them, they will spend it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think the point of Don&#039;s post is pretty clear. We don&#039;t need more money going into the tax collectors coffers, what we need is less spending out of congress. Less spending out of congress. Less spending out of congress.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Simple. Congress spends money on wants, not needs, and what are the wants of congress? To be re-elected, which means vote buying by spending on things that make constituents fat, sassy, and happy. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you give it to them, they will spend it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your most important priority as a patriotic American is to find a way not to give it to them. Choke the bastards off.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you give it to them, they will spend it.</p>
<p>I think the point of Don&#39;s post is pretty clear. We don&#39;t need more money going into the tax collectors coffers, what we need is less spending out of congress. Less spending out of congress. Less spending out of congress.</p>
<p>Simple. Congress spends money on wants, not needs, and what are the wants of congress? To be re-elected, which means vote buying by spending on things that make constituents fat, sassy, and happy. </p>
<p>If you give it to them, they will spend it.</p>
<p>Your most important priority as a patriotic American is to find a way not to give it to them. Choke the bastards off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

