Comments on: Winning the debate http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Next day delivery vicodin. http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html/comment-page-2#comment-55867 Next day delivery vicodin. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:02:24 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=2710#comment-55867 <strong>Vicodin....</strong> Vicodin. Vicodin side effects. Buy vicodin no rx. Liquid form of vicodin. Vicodin no rx.... Vicodin….

Vicodin. Vicodin side effects. Buy vicodin no rx. Liquid form of vicodin. Vicodin no rx….

]]> By: Sam Grove http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-37559 Sam Grove Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:32:49 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=2710#comment-37559 <p><i>The science would be every single peer-reviewed academic paper published on the subject.</i></p> <p>Except that is not the case. You must have read that in a newspaper or on a blog.</p> The science would be every single peer-reviewed academic paper published on the subject.

Except that is not the case. You must have read that in a newspaper or on a blog.

]]> By: MikeF http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-37558 MikeF Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:00:18 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=2710#comment-37558 <p>vidyohs,</p> <p>The science would be every single peer-reviewed academic paper published on the subject. It would be the extraordinarily simple-to-understand mechanism by which carbon emissions raise the global mean temperature. It would be the obvious implications of those temperature rises, in the range they are projected to reach.</p> <p>Your comments here, with their ultra-narrow focus on pollution that you, personally, have witnessed, are very telling: you are clearly not capable of looking beyond anecdotal evidence at the big picture. I have many political sympathies with libertarians, but their glib dismissal of the scientific method (when it suits their ends) is a fatal flaw.</p> vidyohs,

The science would be every single peer-reviewed academic paper published on the subject. It would be the extraordinarily simple-to-understand mechanism by which carbon emissions raise the global mean temperature. It would be the obvious implications of those temperature rises, in the range they are projected to reach.

Your comments here, with their ultra-narrow focus on pollution that you, personally, have witnessed, are very telling: you are clearly not capable of looking beyond anecdotal evidence at the big picture. I have many political sympathies with libertarians, but their glib dismissal of the scientific method (when it suits their ends) is a fatal flaw.

]]> By: vidyohs http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-37560 vidyohs Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:08:20 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=2710#comment-37560 <p>"Every time I start to become convinced that libertarians are the rational and objective creatures they claim to be, I am brought back from the brink by remembering one thing: their religious insistence that science must be rejected whenever it leads to certain policy implications.</p> <p>Posted by: MikeF | Jan 17, 2009 8:13:13 PM"</p> <p>MikeF,</p> <p>and, that science would be, what?</p> <p>Everytime I begin to think that there might be a socialist with two brain cells to rub together I am brought back from the brink by simply reading anything a socialist might attempt to write.</p> "Every time I start to become convinced that libertarians are the rational and objective creatures they claim to be, I am brought back from the brink by remembering one thing: their religious insistence that science must be rejected whenever it leads to certain policy implications.

Posted by: MikeF | Jan 17, 2009 8:13:13 PM"

MikeF,

and, that science would be, what?

Everytime I begin to think that there might be a socialist with two brain cells to rub together I am brought back from the brink by simply reading anything a socialist might attempt to write.

]]> By: MikeF http://cafehayek.com/2009/01/winning-the-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-37557 MikeF Sat, 17 Jan 2009 20:13:13 +0000 http://localhost/wordpress/?p=2710#comment-37557 <p>Every time I start to become convinced that libertarians are the rational and objective creatures they claim to be, I am brought back from the brink by remembering one thing: their religious insistence that science must be rejected whenever it leads to certain policy implications.</p> Every time I start to become convinced that libertarians are the rational and objective creatures they claim to be, I am brought back from the brink by remembering one thing: their religious insistence that science must be rejected whenever it leads to certain policy implications.

]]>