61-37

I think that Sveta's last paragraph translates into English as:

If brains were gasoline, Mierduck wouldn't have enough to drive an ant's go-kart around the inside of a Cheerio

Either that, or it's a comment on his genealogy.

Note that muirduck uses the language that is common on university campuses. Terms like "cowboy", "republican great depression". Is he 18 years old?

translated muirduck - anything I don't like in business is called "capitalist cowboys" and blah blah blah. Logic thrown out the window, worship at the "Church of Emotion" services at 12PM.

muirgeo,

Just a friendly suggestion - your ad hominem comments about wall street would make more sense if you likened them to animals, not cowboys.

That site went up two or three weeks ago. It's been blank ever since.

"We are still here because the products those Wall Street Financial Cowboys created have brought credit to a standstill because no one will declare "Whats in their Wallets" or in fact no one "knows" even though EVERYONE knows its less then ZERO."

-Muir

Anyone wanna try and decipher this?

I can't for the life of me decided what the hell they're doing in the GOP.

Posted by: Mezzanine

Yeah , because republicans are so fiscally conservative right? Do you guys even care about the facts? However, once again you do confirm the libertarian bias for the GOP. You guys say not to confuse Libertarians with Republicans but from a real life practical point of view there is no difference. Its basically why you emphasize the current proposed solutions to this problem as well as the last Republican Great Depression as the issue while ignoring and making the lamest of excuses how we got.

Let me summarize; We got here because a bunch of Wall Street Financial Cowboys were allowed to roam free and unattended. We are still here because the products those Wall Street Financial Cowboys created have brought credit to a standstill because no one will declare "Whats in their Wallets" or in fact no one "knows" even though EVERYONE knows its less then ZERO.

I was actually discussing Specter with other Pennsylvanians tonight, specifically how he keeps getting re-elected(aside from the obvious advantages of incumbency). The DSCC has never really targeted him, presumably because he's not a staunch conservative; on the other hand he only won the 2004 Republican primary by 51-49, and that was with endorsements from Bush and Santorum who obviously won't be around in 2010. It'll be an interesting Senate race to say the least.

I find it amusing that the website's main "text block" is an image, not text.

-dk

Can you dig it? Snowe, Collins and Specter should all just officially join the Democrat Party because I can't for the life of me decided what the hell they're doing in the GOP.