Here's a letter that I sent a couple of weeks ago to a CNN on-air personality:
Mr. Rick Sanchez, Host, CNN NewsRoom
Dear Mr. Sanchez:
Re
your interview today with economics students at Georgia State
University: when a young man said that he is skeptical of government
regulation and that he values individual liberty, you derisively
accused him of believing that the economy would work well "without any
rules."
The smug assurance of your accusation reveals your gross
misunderstanding of the case for free markets. That case is not that
rules are unnecessary. Rather, it's that rules written by politicians
and enforced by bureaucrats generally work much less well than do rules
that emerge decentrally – rules that evolve from the voluntary
interactions and successes and mistakes of individuals each pursuing
his or her own goals without being herded by a central authority -
rules that are enforced by competition and by the exercise of personal
responsibility and that, when sufficiently important, become formalized
in case law declared by courts.
The distinction between what you
think of as rules and the kinds of rules that permeate successful
market economies is perhaps subtle. But it's also real and important.
You should try to grasp it.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Share
Podcast RSS Feed
Full EconTalk Text
