Comments on: Fooled by randomness

By: buzz

buzz — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:37:00 +0000

Nope! no consequences from ravaging the environment, polluting the air and the water… It’s all there just for the taking.

See, humans aren’t responsible for their actions when we can blame it all on cow farts.

By: MnM

MnM — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:19:10 +0000

Chris, he's a troll don't feed him.

By: Chris O'Leary

Chris O'Leary — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:06:26 +0000

"You would be thrown out of my debate club..."

This explains a lot.

By: TrUmPiT

TrUmPiT — Tue, 19 May 2009 22:16:29 +0000

"Krugman is a nut, obviously."

Please wait until the end of your bloviation to include insults and ad hominems. Otherwise it is hard to get past your first sentence. Do you want your content read or don't you?

If you insist on calling someone a nut, then do it like this:

Krugman is a nut, obviously, because ...

You would be thrown out of my debate club for failing to follow basic rules of good debating.

By: John Papola

John Papola — Tue, 19 May 2009 22:08:43 +0000

Krugman is a nut, obviously. But I would really like someone to explain to me why I should believe a congress who push ethanol mandates and propose "cash for clunkers" legislation about the environment. Actions speak louder than words, and based on these actions, I'd say they're not nearly as worried about climate change as they claim to be.

Nobody that truly cares about the environment would propose these policies.