<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Sanford Affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Expired bactrim ds.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-55828</link>
		<dc:creator>Expired bactrim ds.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-55828</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bactrim....&lt;/strong&gt;

Bactrim. Bactrim ds....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bactrim&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Bactrim. Bactrim ds&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natural alternatives to fosamax.</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-55636</link>
		<dc:creator>Natural alternatives to fosamax.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-55636</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fosamax....&lt;/strong&gt;

Fosamax. Fosamax alendronate sodium. Fosamax adverse effects. Compare fosamax and other osteoporosis medications. Fosamax side effects. Fosamax and dead jaw....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fosamax&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Fosamax. Fosamax alendronate sodium. Fosamax adverse effects. Compare fosamax and other osteoporosis medications. Fosamax side effects. Fosamax and dead jaw&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53625</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53625</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Best summary of the situation that i have seen.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best summary of the situation that i have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53626</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think this way and am still conflicted, but he did use tax payer money to fund an affair.  Is he susceptible to corruption?  Is he compulsive?  I think he would be a good president, but the last time we had a compulsive president we were stuck fighting 2 expensive wars that we could not win against an unidentifiable enemy.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think this way and am still conflicted, but he did use tax payer money to fund an affair.  Is he susceptible to corruption?  Is he compulsive?  I think he would be a good president, but the last time we had a compulsive president we were stuck fighting 2 expensive wars that we could not win against an unidentifiable enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53627</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I used to think this way and am still conflicted, but he did use tax payer money to fund an affair.  Is he susceptible to corruption?  Is he compulsive?  I think he would be a good president, but the last time we had a compulsive president we were stuck fighting 2 expensive wars that we could not win against an unidentifiable enemy.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to think this way and am still conflicted, but he did use tax payer money to fund an affair.  Is he susceptible to corruption?  Is he compulsive?  I think he would be a good president, but the last time we had a compulsive president we were stuck fighting 2 expensive wars that we could not win against an unidentifiable enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53628</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The last time we had a compulsive president we had Bill Clinton but, that was &quot;only about sex&quot; and we should &quot;move on.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time we had a compulsive president we had Bill Clinton but, that was &quot;only about sex&quot; and we should &quot;move on.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcy</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53629</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53629</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What makes us think that someone who refuses to honor one oath -- his marriage vow -- is going to honor his oath of office?  Or having broken either one of them once, isn&#039;t a very good candidate for a repeat performance?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the oath of office isn&#039;t something we hold a politician to, then we might as well just install kings who can hand out public funds to their friends or spend it on their own pleasures, without accountability, and who exercise increasing control with no regard to our rights.  Which is pretty much the direction we&#039;re headed.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes us think that someone who refuses to honor one oath &#8212; his marriage vow &#8212; is going to honor his oath of office?  Or having broken either one of them once, isn&#39;t a very good candidate for a repeat performance?</p>
<p>If the oath of office isn&#39;t something we hold a politician to, then we might as well just install kings who can hand out public funds to their friends or spend it on their own pleasures, without accountability, and who exercise increasing control with no regard to our rights.  Which is pretty much the direction we&#39;re headed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Brock</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53630</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53630</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
... if a high-ranking government official is absent, dead, or comatose, the society will still continue along productively.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the same logic doesn&#039;t apply to a high-ranking corporate official?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
&#8230; if a high-ranking government official is absent, dead, or comatose, the society will still continue along productively.
</p></blockquote>
<p>But the same logic doesn&#39;t apply to a high-ranking corporate official?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Boudreaux</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53631</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Boudreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53631</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Although I believe that corporate officials of any rank generally are far more socially productive than are even the highest-ranking government official, I&#039;ve never known a society to be endangered by the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of any corporate official.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I believe that corporate officials of any rank generally are far more socially productive than are even the highest-ranking government official, I&#39;ve never known a society to be endangered by the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of any corporate official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53632</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53632</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Considering the degree of waste present in nearly all state spending, I see no reason to be overly concerned about a few thousand dollars spent on trips to Argentina.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In a contractual government, it wouldn&#039;t matter.  All that would matter is whether or not the office holder had fulfilled the terms of his or her contract without going over budget.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the degree of waste present in nearly all state spending, I see no reason to be overly concerned about a few thousand dollars spent on trips to Argentina.</p>
<p>In a contractual government, it wouldn&#39;t matter.  All that would matter is whether or not the office holder had fulfilled the terms of his or her contract without going over budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Ransom</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53633</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ransom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems most all of the politician these days are the most pathetic sort of narcissist.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Be faithless to people and lie to them and betray their trust? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At the drop of a hat.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems most all of the politician these days are the most pathetic sort of narcissist.</p>
<p>Be faithless to people and lie to them and betray their trust? </p>
<p>At the drop of a hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAVE</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53634</link>
		<dc:creator>DAVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53634</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;What makes us think that someone who refuses to honor one oath -- his marriage vow -- is going to honor his oath of office? Or having broken either one of them once, isn&#039;t a very good candidate for a repeat performance?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Come off it. The guy screwed up. Like Don said: He never presented himself as better or wiser than anyone else. He screwed up and it&#039;s no one&#039;s business.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What makes us think that someone who refuses to honor one oath &#8212; his marriage vow &#8212; is going to honor his oath of office? Or having broken either one of them once, isn&#39;t a very good candidate for a repeat performance?&quot;</p>
<p>Come off it. The guy screwed up. Like Don said: He never presented himself as better or wiser than anyone else. He screwed up and it&#39;s no one&#39;s business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheers</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53635</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53635</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yea, I hate to break it to you Jeremy, but so far as impulsive means &quot;characterized by undue haste and lack of thought or deliberation&quot; the last time we had an impulsive President, he decided to reform the health system, financial system and automotive sector within the first 6 months of presidency.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, I hate to break it to you Jeremy, but so far as impulsive means &quot;characterized by undue haste and lack of thought or deliberation&quot; the last time we had an impulsive President, he decided to reform the health system, financial system and automotive sector within the first 6 months of presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53636</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53636</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Martin,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And, exactly what do we do, what do we think, when there is no difference?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;But the same logic doesn&#039;t apply to a high-ranking corporate official?&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by: Martin Brock &#124; Jun 28, 2009 12:34:58 PM&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Although I believe that corporate officials of any rank generally are far more socially productive than are even the highest-ranking government official, I&#039;ve never known a society to be endangered by the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of any corporate official.&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by: Don Boudreaux &#124; Jun 28, 2009 12:50:50 PM&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A corporation is a corporation is a corporation, and by any other name should smell so sweet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Fill a pot with cold water, stick your hand in, then pull your hand out. The hole you leave behind is the hole that will be left when Bill Gates dies, Steven Jobs dies, when Putin dies, Obama dies, that was left when Kennedy died, and when you and I die.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Somehow when a person, and person, exits this vale of tears, the rest of us just soldier on.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin,</p>
<p>And, exactly what do we do, what do we think, when there is no difference?</p>
<p>&quot;But the same logic doesn&#39;t apply to a high-ranking corporate official?<br />
Posted by: Martin Brock | Jun 28, 2009 12:34:58 PM&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Although I believe that corporate officials of any rank generally are far more socially productive than are even the highest-ranking government official, I&#39;ve never known a society to be endangered by the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of any corporate official.<br />
Posted by: Don Boudreaux | Jun 28, 2009 12:50:50 PM&quot;</p>
<p>A corporation is a corporation is a corporation, and by any other name should smell so sweet.</p>
<p>Fill a pot with cold water, stick your hand in, then pull your hand out. The hole you leave behind is the hole that will be left when Bill Gates dies, Steven Jobs dies, when Putin dies, Obama dies, that was left when Kennedy died, and when you and I die.</p>
<p>Somehow when a person, and person, exits this vale of tears, the rest of us just soldier on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53637</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Somehow when a person, and person, exits this vale of tears, the rest of us just soldier on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Should have read, ....any person, exits this vale of......&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow when a person, and person, exits this vale of tears, the rest of us just soldier on.</p>
<p>Should have read, &#8230;.any person, exits this vale of&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babinich</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53638</link>
		<dc:creator>Babinich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;A politician who holds himself or herself out as a savior - as such a paragon of virtue that he or she can be trusted with vast swaths of our lives and property - certainly should not be suffered to remain in office once that person is revealed to be simply another ordinary human being, as faulty as the rest of us.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyone who holds themselves out as a savior or messiah should be cast out into the dustbin of history.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To me infidelity is an egregious character flaw. This crack in character was exceeded by the greater sin which was that the chief executive of a state could not be located for a period of time.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;A politician who holds himself or herself out as a savior &#8211; as such a paragon of virtue that he or she can be trusted with vast swaths of our lives and property &#8211; certainly should not be suffered to remain in office once that person is revealed to be simply another ordinary human being, as faulty as the rest of us.&quot;</p>
<p>Anyone who holds themselves out as a savior or messiah should be cast out into the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>To me infidelity is an egregious character flaw. This crack in character was exceeded by the greater sin which was that the chief executive of a state could not be located for a period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Clementi</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53639</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Clementi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53639</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We are all humans and inherently flawed.  Can anyone honestly be surprised when evidence comes out that a politician is human?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some say: we simply need to find the &quot;right people&quot; to be our leaders.  I say: why not avoid placing so much trust (and power) in their hands? &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are all humans and inherently flawed.  Can anyone honestly be surprised when evidence comes out that a politician is human?</p>
<p>Some say: we simply need to find the &quot;right people&quot; to be our leaders.  I say: why not avoid placing so much trust (and power) in their hands? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Brock</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53640</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53640</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
And, exactly what do we do, what do we think, when there is no difference?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My statement here refers to discussion of Don&#039;s previous post.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the one hand, in this post, the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of a particular corporate official has no very dire consequences, because this official is only one person.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, in the previous post, one corporate official can contribute tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in value to the corporation in a single year, as much as a thousand other employees combined, because his unique contribution is so rare and valuable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;These assertions seem inconsistent to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
And, exactly what do we do, what do we think, when there is no difference?
</p></blockquote>
<p>My statement here refers to discussion of Don&#39;s previous post.</p>
<p>On the one hand, in this post, the sudden disappearance, death, or retirement of a particular corporate official has no very dire consequences, because this official is only one person.</p>
<p>On the other hand, in the previous post, one corporate official can contribute tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in value to the corporation in a single year, as much as a thousand other employees combined, because his unique contribution is so rare and valuable.</p>
<p>These assertions seem inconsistent to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53641</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53641</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I don&#039;t think Obama is compulsive.  He thinks out his plans very deliberately and maximizes his political agenda.  He wishes to remodel America in a way in which neither you or I agree with or approve of and the philosophy which he rationalizes his actions with is silly and evil, but I would contend that he is very deliberate.  Horrible, but deliberate. On the other hand, I think the decision to invade Iraq was knee-jerk and compulsive.  Bush was compulsive and horrible, while Obama is deliberate and extremely horrible.  My only point is that pragmatism and deliberation are desirable traits for a president to have especially in foreign policy.  I agree that the Pres should have much less power, but this is irrelevant to my point.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#39;t think Obama is compulsive.  He thinks out his plans very deliberately and maximizes his political agenda.  He wishes to remodel America in a way in which neither you or I agree with or approve of and the philosophy which he rationalizes his actions with is silly and evil, but I would contend that he is very deliberate.  Horrible, but deliberate. On the other hand, I think the decision to invade Iraq was knee-jerk and compulsive.  Bush was compulsive and horrible, while Obama is deliberate and extremely horrible.  My only point is that pragmatism and deliberation are desirable traits for a president to have especially in foreign policy.  I agree that the Pres should have much less power, but this is irrelevant to my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C. Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html/comment-page-1#comment-53642</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C. Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/06/on-the-sanford-affair.html#comment-53642</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;infidelities shouldn&#039;t end political careers&quot; - heh, but they can hurt them and more...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;such a paragon of virtue that he or she can be trusted with vast swaths of our lives and property&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looks like Edwards is being accused of a sex tape on top of all the rest... http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/06/28/2009-06-28_aides_tale_of_john_edwards_sex_tape.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sanford, please don&#039;t have a sex tape. :(&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;infidelities shouldn&#39;t end political careers&quot; &#8211; heh, but they can hurt them and more&#8230;</p>
<p>&quot;such a paragon of virtue that he or she can be trusted with vast swaths of our lives and property&quot;</p>
<p>Looks like Edwards is being accused of a sex tape on top of all the rest&#8230; <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/06/28/2009-06-28_aides_tale_of_john_edwards_sex_tape.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/06/28/2009-06-28_aides_tale_of_john_edwards_sex_tape.html</a></p>
<p>Sanford, please don&#39;t have a sex tape. <img src='http://cafehayek.com/site/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

