<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perils of Central Banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vikingvista</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/comment-page-1#comment-52565</link>
		<dc:creator>vikingvista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html#comment-52565</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But the economy of the last 96 years would&#039;ve been EVEN MORE unstable without the Fed.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Nice summary of Fed folly.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the economy of the last 96 years would&#39;ve been EVEN MORE unstable without the Fed.  </p>
<p>Nice summary of Fed folly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dg lesvic</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/comment-page-1#comment-52566</link>
		<dc:creator>dg lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html#comment-52566</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Prof Boudreaux,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If I understood you correctly, you spoke of the US money stock&#039;s losing a third of its pre-crash value as the &quot;great contraction.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Was that just a different way of saying that the capital stock lost a third of its value, and that the money stock and capital stock were interchangeable terms?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof Boudreaux,</p>
<p>If I understood you correctly, you spoke of the US money stock&#39;s losing a third of its pre-crash value as the &quot;great contraction.&quot;</p>
<p>Was that just a different way of saying that the capital stock lost a third of its value, and that the money stock and capital stock were interchangeable terms?</p>
</p>
</p>
</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dg lesvic</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/comment-page-1#comment-52567</link>
		<dc:creator>dg lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html#comment-52567</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m having a terrible time understanding &quot;the value of the money stock.&quot;  I can&#039;t figure out how you value it.  I can understand how you value the capital stock.  It&#039;s worth one third fewer dollars.  But how do you value the money stock?  It&#039;s worth one third less capital goods?  But what are the capital goods worth?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m having a terrible time understanding &quot;the value of the money stock.&quot;  I can&#39;t figure out how you value it.  I can understand how you value the capital stock.  It&#39;s worth one third fewer dollars.  But how do you value the money stock?  It&#39;s worth one third less capital goods?  But what are the capital goods worth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Ackermann</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/comment-page-1#comment-52568</link>
		<dc:creator>K Ackermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html#comment-52568</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;dg lesvic, that&#039;s a good question; did it lose 1/3rd of its purchasing power? If so, for how long?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t remember reading about a money shock before the crash.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dg lesvic, that&#39;s a good question; did it lose 1/3rd of its purchasing power? If so, for how long?</p>
<p>I don&#39;t remember reading about a money shock before the crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Ackermann</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html/comment-page-1#comment-52569</link>
		<dc:creator>K Ackermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.32.86.159/2009/07/the-perils-of-central-banking.html#comment-52569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Fed needs to be audited.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thing that bothers me the most right now is how the Fed, and Treasury, have bent over backwards to prevent price discovery of bank&#039;s illiquid assets.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even the ban on shorting back last fall was designed to prevent price discovery.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, with the change in accounting, the banks are carrying severely impaired balance sheets like nothing is amiss.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In fact, they are doing so well, and are so flush with money, that they can return the TARP funds. After all, the plan is for you and I to purchase this theoretically valuable paper.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why should the banks have to borrow taxpayer money, when they can sell us valuable assets instead?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Merill got 22 cents for their paper. That&#039;s where I&#039;d be willing to step in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I bet the PPIP is not going to go forward until the next crisis of confidence in the banks. or in about 4 months - October.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Fed absolutely needs this paper to be worth something. It&#039;s what is backing our currency now. It what the Fed is going to have to use to mop up reserves someday.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Fed and the Treasury have made a mockery of the free market. The stimulus at least goes through the motions of adhering to the free market - albiet, the demand is artificial, but monetary, bank, and accounting policy during this crisis has been horrible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I literally cannot go near the market right now, because I don&#039;t have a clue what is truth, and what is fiction. All I know is, we are in for some real pain.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fed needs to be audited.</p>
<p>The thing that bothers me the most right now is how the Fed, and Treasury, have bent over backwards to prevent price discovery of bank&#39;s illiquid assets.</p>
<p>Even the ban on shorting back last fall was designed to prevent price discovery.</p>
<p>Now, with the change in accounting, the banks are carrying severely impaired balance sheets like nothing is amiss.</p>
<p>In fact, they are doing so well, and are so flush with money, that they can return the TARP funds. After all, the plan is for you and I to purchase this theoretically valuable paper.</p>
<p>Why should the banks have to borrow taxpayer money, when they can sell us valuable assets instead?</p>
<p>Merill got 22 cents for their paper. That&#39;s where I&#39;d be willing to step in.</p>
<p>I bet the PPIP is not going to go forward until the next crisis of confidence in the banks. or in about 4 months &#8211; October.</p>
<p>The Fed absolutely needs this paper to be worth something. It&#39;s what is backing our currency now. It what the Fed is going to have to use to mop up reserves someday.</p>
<p>The Fed and the Treasury have made a mockery of the free market. The stimulus at least goes through the motions of adhering to the free market &#8211; albiet, the demand is artificial, but monetary, bank, and accounting policy during this crisis has been horrible.</p>
<p>I literally cannot go near the market right now, because I don&#39;t have a clue what is truth, and what is fiction. All I know is, we are in for some real pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

