Yours is the analysis of a fool.

Weren’t we just at this intersection?

and their “ain’t” no….should have been “and there “ain’t no”

“you must listen to instrumental music exclusively”, Hmmm, appears to be analysis to me. Evidence looked at, assessed, and a conclusion drawn. Is that not analysis, Disingenuous K.?

Then we have this:

“you get so irate”, Hmm, more analysis, based on the same logical breakdown described in the last paragraph. Can you show me the exact wording that lead one to believe that I was irate when I wrote that, Disingenuous K.?

Slapping lefties upside the head either in rhetoric or physically is, by myself, never done in anger or irritation. It is done in pure cold rational realization that it is the only, best, and most productive way of dealing with the socialist hardcore, because I am old enough, wise enough, and experienced enough to have learned that long before you were a careless gleam in your dad’s eye.

Perspective, DK, look the word up in the dictionary. It is what so many here have, and was gained by those long years of being in the pits with the devils of life, and which produced that wisdom and experience I speak of. Your lack of perspective showed in the first post you ever made here, and it stuck out like a sore thumb, methinks, Sam Grove, et.al. spotted it as well.

You have your head full of “book learnin’s” but you haven’t traveled enough of the hard roads yet to know how much of that stuff in your head is bullcrap.

Yet, as we said in the Navy about guys like you, you’re young, dumb, and full of cum, and their “ain’t” no reason to step back and consider the words of others when you have the handle on it already.

It is nice to make your own mistakes, but like most, you’re intent on making “ours” all over again.

Perspective, you don’t have it as part of your skill set at birth.

But, then they throw in with and romanticize about authoritarian political leaders. I never could figure out if they simply didn’t recognize the contradiction or if it was just that their own inflated self image finally found the father figure worthy of their adulation.

Yours was the analysis of a fool.

“Imagine no possessions”, oh okay; just how are we to eat if we can’t possess food, how are we to be stable in our life’s if we must move with the seasons to stay warm because we have no clothes? Obviously with no possessions that migration to stay warm would have to be on foot…..no wait we’d all be dead because we can’t possess anything to eat.

In short John was a “head up his ass” leftie….no wait I was redundant again.

“Imagine no possessions,
I wonder if you can.
No need for greed or hunger,
A brotherhood of man.”

Couldn’t that be considered a Rothbardian dream?

You know, if Glenn Hubbard wanted to do another parody, this Harrison song is ripe with ready-made lyrics to weave today’s bad economics and loss of liberty into song.

And if you think about it another way, he probably assumed that most everyone in the audience was an Obama fan. I don’t know whether that was a good assumption or not, but if it was, he’ll (re)gain market share. His profit motive should have made you enjoy the concert more, not less.

John moved to New York, but not so he could be treated better by the government – he was persecuted far more, if anything. He was “carrying pictures of Chairman Mao” around that time.

I ranted a little about the context of it in the British political scene on the other post, maybe it would have been more appropriate here. http://cafehayek.com/2009/08/beatlemania.html?dsq=13816777#comment-13816777

“This is a bitter song about how much money The Beatles were paying in taxes. People with high earnings pay exorbitant taxes in England. Many successful entertainers leave the country so they can keep more of their money. As a result, The Beatles – as well as The Who and The Rolling Stones – spent a lot of time in America and other parts of Europe as “tax exiles.”"

http://www.songfacts.com/detail.php?id=101