<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleaned by Capitalism XVII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-183305</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6602#comment-183305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to figure out which is dumber--the deductive argument you attribute to Don, or the belief that Don is making a deductive argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to figure out which is dumber&#8211;the deductive argument you attribute to Don, or the belief that Don is making a deductive argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-183125</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6602#comment-183125</guid>
		<description>Are you trying to prove Billy&#039;s point about the pettiness and irrelevance of your comments on here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you trying to prove Billy&#8217;s point about the pettiness and irrelevance of your comments on here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-183120</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6602#comment-183120</guid>
		<description>Oh look Danny&#039;s found a playfriend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh look Danny&#8217;s found a playfriend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-183117</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6602#comment-183117</guid>
		<description>RE: &quot;It&#039;s dissapointing that one can&#039;t ask reasonable questions about the merits of capitalism without being charged with socialist sympathies.&quot;

Amen.  You&#039;ve described many of the commenters here to a tee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;It&#8217;s dissapointing that one can&#8217;t ask reasonable questions about the merits of capitalism without being charged with socialist sympathies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen.  You&#8217;ve described many of the commenters here to a tee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/cleaned-by-capitalism-xvii.html/comment-page-1#comment-183114</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6602#comment-183114</guid>
		<description>Again, saying unregulated capitalism poses special problems for the  
health of the natural environment is not to say that socialism does  
not pose special problems for the health of the natural enviornment.

I think I&#039;m done with this thread. It&#039;s dissapointing that one can&#039;t  
ask reasonable questions about the merits of capitalism without being  
charged with socialist sympathies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, saying unregulated capitalism poses special problems for the<br />
health of the natural environment is not to say that socialism does<br />
not pose special problems for the health of the natural enviornment.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m done with this thread. It&#8217;s dissapointing that one can&#8217;t<br />
ask reasonable questions about the merits of capitalism without being<br />
charged with socialist sympathies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

