<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: He Asked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/comment-page-1#comment-183247</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6615#comment-183247</guid>
		<description>Mark Gendala, you&#039;ve just publicly confessed to intellectual bankruptcy.  You have no actual argument to offer in support of your position -- so you resort to the threat of physical violence from those who demand that I be forced to purchase the product they make instead of the one I prefer.

This is very typical of statists of all sorts.  Lacking any actual, valid arguments in support of their position, they can only resort to smears -- &quot;You are racist! -- or character assassination -- &quot;You are stupid!&quot; -- or threats of physical violence -- or completely unsupported claims -- &quot;Deregulation caused the recession!&quot;.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Gendala, you&#8217;ve just publicly confessed to intellectual bankruptcy.  You have no actual argument to offer in support of your position &#8212; so you resort to the threat of physical violence from those who demand that I be forced to purchase the product they make instead of the one I prefer.</p>
<p>This is very typical of statists of all sorts.  Lacking any actual, valid arguments in support of their position, they can only resort to smears &#8212; &#8220;You are racist! &#8212; or character assassination &#8212; &#8220;You are stupid!&#8221; &#8212; or threats of physical violence &#8212; or completely unsupported claims &#8212; &#8220;Deregulation caused the recession!&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/comment-page-1#comment-183234</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6615#comment-183234</guid>
		<description>&quot;May I suggest the next time you come across an American tyre-industry worker, express you dismay at President Obama&#039;s recent decision to protect his or hers $20 per hour job from $2 per hour Asian competition.&quot;

I thought Obama was using the tariff to &quot;protect&quot; American consumers from dangerous Chinese tires... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;May I suggest the next time you come across an American tyre-industry worker, express you dismay at President Obama&#8217;s recent decision to protect his or hers $20 per hour job from $2 per hour Asian competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought Obama was using the tariff to &#8220;protect&#8221; American consumers from dangerous Chinese tires&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoscoH</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/comment-page-1#comment-183231</link>
		<dc:creator>BoscoH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6615#comment-183231</guid>
		<description>Mark: Obama&#039;s tyre tariff might &quot;save&quot; 3500 jobs, so the chance of running into an affected tyre worker are pretty slim. And you&#039;re saying that these tyre workers are violent and have to be treated with economic kid gloves? By not protecting him from competition, I can expect an ass kicking, Yet, by making me pay more for tyres, he doesn&#039;t expect the same in return? Seems like a strange balance of violence to me, considering my preference affects 3500 people, while his affects 300 million. Crocodile Dundee and Steve Erwin both hate those odds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Obama&#8217;s tyre tariff might &#8220;save&#8221; 3500 jobs, so the chance of running into an affected tyre worker are pretty slim. And you&#8217;re saying that these tyre workers are violent and have to be treated with economic kid gloves? By not protecting him from competition, I can expect an ass kicking, Yet, by making me pay more for tyres, he doesn&#8217;t expect the same in return? Seems like a strange balance of violence to me, considering my preference affects 3500 people, while his affects 300 million. Crocodile Dundee and Steve Erwin both hate those odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gendala</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/comment-page-1#comment-183228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gendala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6615#comment-183228</guid>
		<description>Hi - more power the Aussie expats... Greg, I&#039;m delighted that you and rest of you happy campers have got your economics all figured-out. Obviously, your undoubted expertise on matters economical should now be put into practical use -

May I suggest the next time you come across an American tyre-industry worker, express you dismay at President Obama&#039;s recent decision to protect his or hers $20 per hour job from $2 per hour Asian competition.

Warning!!! Chances are that a kick up your backside may be so hard that you could end-up in Australia far earlier then you&#039;ve ever planned.

G&#039;day
Mark
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; more power the Aussie expats&#8230; Greg, I&#8217;m delighted that you and rest of you happy campers have got your economics all figured-out. Obviously, your undoubted expertise on matters economical should now be put into practical use -</p>
<p>May I suggest the next time you come across an American tyre-industry worker, express you dismay at President Obama&#8217;s recent decision to protect his or hers $20 per hour job from $2 per hour Asian competition.</p>
<p>Warning!!! Chances are that a kick up your backside may be so hard that you could end-up in Australia far earlier then you&#8217;ve ever planned.</p>
<p>G&#8217;day<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/he-asked.html/comment-page-1#comment-183189</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6615#comment-183189</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s say that someone invents a device such that it transfers a body of knowledge equivalent to that obtained from a normal college education in 30 seconds after it is placed over a student&#039;s head.  While this would indeed be a misfortune for those of us who are professors and teachers, it would nevertheless be a great benefit to society, as innumerable educational resources would be used to do other things.   What would the Mr. Mark _____ in Australia then do should such an invention be made?  Would he stop the wheels of progress by prohibiting anyone from using such a device?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s say that someone invents a device such that it transfers a body of knowledge equivalent to that obtained from a normal college education in 30 seconds after it is placed over a student&#8217;s head.  While this would indeed be a misfortune for those of us who are professors and teachers, it would nevertheless be a great benefit to society, as innumerable educational resources would be used to do other things.   What would the Mr. Mark _____ in Australia then do should such an invention be made?  Would he stop the wheels of progress by prohibiting anyone from using such a device?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

