<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More of the Same Mercantilism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: louh</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182538</link>
		<dc:creator>louh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6535#comment-182538</guid>
		<description>Economically favorable outcomes implies may entail a zero sum game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economically favorable outcomes implies may entail a zero sum game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182537</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6535#comment-182537</guid>
		<description>By &quot;happy outcomes,&quot; I meant &quot;economically favorable outcomes.&quot; I was not implying any direct connection to emotional happiness. 

One cannot &quot;openly&quot; pursue one&#039;s needs and desires in a market where other people are permitted to use coercion. 

If you think advertising is coercive, there is no point in talking. We mean utterly different things by &quot;coercion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;happy outcomes,&#8221; I meant &#8220;economically favorable outcomes.&#8221; I was not implying any direct connection to emotional happiness. </p>
<p>One cannot &#8220;openly&#8221; pursue one&#8217;s needs and desires in a market where other people are permitted to use coercion. </p>
<p>If you think advertising is coercive, there is no point in talking. We mean utterly different things by &#8220;coercion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louh</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182497</link>
		<dc:creator>louh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6535#comment-182497</guid>
		<description>Again I disagree, the definition of free markets is the open pursuit of personal needs and desires. Happiness need not be a part of the equation. Advertising is coercive, should we agree with Marx that it should be eliminated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again I disagree, the definition of free markets is the open pursuit of personal needs and desires. Happiness need not be a part of the equation. Advertising is coercive, should we agree with Marx that it should be eliminated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182484</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6535#comment-182484</guid>
		<description>If libertarianism means anything, surely, it is that one is most unlikely to produce happy outcomes in free markets by introducing one&#039;s preferred mode of coercion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If libertarianism means anything, surely, it is that one is most unlikely to produce happy outcomes in free markets by introducing one&#8217;s preferred mode of coercion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louh</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/more-of-the-same-mercantilism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182481</link>
		<dc:creator>louh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6535#comment-182481</guid>
		<description>I would agree, for reasons given,  that the harm to the Chinese may be incalculable but for American companies it can only serve to produce the opposite effect. US companies will strive, and innovate even more.  The rules needn&#039;t  be fair in order to yield a productive outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree, for reasons given,  that the harm to the Chinese may be incalculable but for American companies it can only serve to produce the opposite effect. US companies will strive, and innovate even more.  The rules needn&#8217;t  be fair in order to yield a productive outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

