<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Racism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182125</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182125</guid>
		<description>For full disclosure, I have not listened to Rush Limbaugh for 20 years, but like I said, a quick Google search will show that he has said some racist things. (To be fair, to get some context from where the quotes were extracted will take a little longer.)

I just pulled up the first 3 links that popped up for me while searching &quot;rush limbaugh racist quotes&quot; and I must say it&#039;s hard for anyone to justify slavery or justify awarding a confessed murderer a medal of honor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For full disclosure, I have not listened to Rush Limbaugh for 20 years, but like I said, a quick Google search will show that he has said some racist things. (To be fair, to get some context from where the quotes were extracted will take a little longer.)</p>
<p>I just pulled up the first 3 links that popped up for me while searching &#8220;rush limbaugh racist quotes&#8221; and I must say it&#8217;s hard for anyone to justify slavery or justify awarding a confessed murderer a medal of honor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Jamison</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182081</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182081</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been listening to Rush for nearly 20 years. He is quick to poke fun at the real racists, people who use race as a tool for ensuring a convenient division of the culture.  Apart from being insensitive to the tyrranical hegemony of political correctness, something real racists like to label racism, he is not one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been listening to Rush for nearly 20 years. He is quick to poke fun at the real racists, people who use race as a tool for ensuring a convenient division of the culture.  Apart from being insensitive to the tyrranical hegemony of political correctness, something real racists like to label racism, he is not one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182059</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182059</guid>
		<description>Just because you hadn&#039;t heard anything racist from Rush during the few hours you tuned in doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s not a racist. His racist comments are well-documented and a quick Google search should change your mind.

**Did you know?** You don&#039;t need to be taped saying the n-word to be labeled a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you hadn&#8217;t heard anything racist from Rush during the few hours you tuned in doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s not a racist. His racist comments are well-documented and a quick Google search should change your mind.</p>
<p>**Did you know?** You don&#8217;t need to be taped saying the n-word to be labeled a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182056</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182056</guid>
		<description>Don, it seems like you (and only you) are likening yourself to Joe Wilson. I don&#039;t think anybody who follows this blog is accusing you of being racist, so why defend yourself?

These people are politically motivated and supported by their constituents. I know for a fact that there is racism and racists out there. Since the makeup of our Congress is -supposed- to represent the makeup of the general US population...some events only make me wonder...

Here&#039;s an interesting observation I saw the other day by a &quot;historian&quot;: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaxscHd4WnM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, it seems like you (and only you) are likening yourself to Joe Wilson. I don&#8217;t think anybody who follows this blog is accusing you of being racist, so why defend yourself?</p>
<p>These people are politically motivated and supported by their constituents. I know for a fact that there is racism and racists out there. Since the makeup of our Congress is -supposed- to represent the makeup of the general US population&#8230;some events only make me wonder&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting observation I saw the other day by a &#8220;historian&#8221;: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaxscHd4WnM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaxscHd4WnM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182052</guid>
		<description>I think we are at risk of missing the big picture.  Joe Wilson shouted &quot;You lie&quot; when the president spoke about illegals being a part of health care reform.  A lot of the discussion since has focused on whether or not Obama critics are racists, and to what degree, instead of focusing on the merits of Obamacare (or even the issue of illegals accessing healthcare).  

It seems to me like the left has jedi mind-tricked the body politic in this regard, by shifting the focus away from the merits (or lack thereof) of the health care proposals.  I suspect some of it has to do with weakening the criticism by attacking the critic(s), instead of addressing head-on whatever piece of the proposal is being criticized.  Wilson certainly didn&#039;t help the discussion by his moronic outburst. 

Maybe Robinson is on a list with Carter in one regard, but not on another.  We could spend some time diving into that and then come up with solid distinctions.  Wouldn&#039;t our time be better spent, however, on more important issues? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are at risk of missing the big picture.  Joe Wilson shouted &#8220;You lie&#8221; when the president spoke about illegals being a part of health care reform.  A lot of the discussion since has focused on whether or not Obama critics are racists, and to what degree, instead of focusing on the merits of Obamacare (or even the issue of illegals accessing healthcare).  </p>
<p>It seems to me like the left has jedi mind-tricked the body politic in this regard, by shifting the focus away from the merits (or lack thereof) of the health care proposals.  I suspect some of it has to do with weakening the criticism by attacking the critic(s), instead of addressing head-on whatever piece of the proposal is being criticized.  Wilson certainly didn&#8217;t help the discussion by his moronic outburst. </p>
<p>Maybe Robinson is on a list with Carter in one regard, but not on another.  We could spend some time diving into that and then come up with solid distinctions.  Wouldn&#8217;t our time be better spent, however, on more important issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182015</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182015</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s a disagreement over the meaning of &quot;driven&quot;. I mean that he says racism isn&#039;t the driving force behind opposition. It isn&#039;t driven by it. &quot;The opposition&quot; seemed to be a collective statement to me. The collective opposition ISN&#039;T driven by racism is Robinson&#039;s position. Some individuals are. That seems to me to be a fundamentally different point from Carter. I agree with you that they say varying degrees of the criticism are motivated by racism. I deliberately didn&#039;t disagree with that portion of your post. I just think it&#039;s strange not to differentiate them. You said yourself &quot;I have no doubt there are people in America who can&#039;t stand Obama because he&#039;s black&quot;, so you seem to be on that list too. All I&#039;m saying is that Robinson seems to be coming from your perspective and my perspective, against Jimmy Carter&#039;s perspective (although Robinson did praise Carter for &quot;putting it on the table&quot; at the same time that he disagreed with him).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a disagreement over the meaning of &#8220;driven&#8221;. I mean that he says racism isn&#8217;t the driving force behind opposition. It isn&#8217;t driven by it. &#8220;The opposition&#8221; seemed to be a collective statement to me. The collective opposition ISN&#8217;T driven by racism is Robinson&#8217;s position. Some individuals are. That seems to me to be a fundamentally different point from Carter. I agree with you that they say varying degrees of the criticism are motivated by racism. I deliberately didn&#8217;t disagree with that portion of your post. I just think it&#8217;s strange not to differentiate them. You said yourself &#8220;I have no doubt there are people in America who can&#8217;t stand Obama because he&#8217;s black&#8221;, so you seem to be on that list too. All I&#8217;m saying is that Robinson seems to be coming from your perspective and my perspective, against Jimmy Carter&#8217;s perspective (although Robinson did praise Carter for &#8220;putting it on the table&#8221; at the same time that he disagreed with him).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182010</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182010</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused, you state Robinson has &quot;been out there saying that the opposition ISN&#039;T driven by racism&quot; and I provide a quote where he says it IS.   Then your response is &quot;Right- that&#039;s what I mean&quot;  ????

We could have a philosophical discussion about to what degree Robinson and Carter see racial motivation, but they are both on the same list of publicly saying (as I put in my post) &quot;that varying degrees of the criticism directed towards Obama are motivated by racism&quot;  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused, you state Robinson has &#8220;been out there saying that the opposition ISN&#8217;T driven by racism&#8221; and I provide a quote where he says it IS.   Then your response is &#8220;Right- that&#8217;s what I mean&#8221;  ????</p>
<p>We could have a philosophical discussion about to what degree Robinson and Carter see racial motivation, but they are both on the same list of publicly saying (as I put in my post) &#8220;that varying degrees of the criticism directed towards Obama are motivated by racism&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182007</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182007</guid>
		<description>Right - that&#039;s what I mean.  I don&#039;t know - I wouldn&#039;t put him on the same list as Carter.  Aren&#039;t some people&#039;s feelings likely to be motivated by racism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right &#8211; that&#8217;s what I mean.  I don&#8217;t know &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t put him on the same list as Carter.  Aren&#8217;t some people&#8217;s feelings likely to be motivated by racism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182006</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182006</guid>
		<description>see:  

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/18/jimmy_carters_favor_98361.html

where he states:  &quot; I can say in plain language that Jimmy Carter was right in essence, but wrong in degree. It seems clear to me that some -- but not &quot;an overwhelming portion,&quot; as Carter claimed -- of the &quot;intensely demonstrated animosity&quot; toward Obama is indeed &quot;based on the fact that he is a black man.&quot; &quot;

also linked at: http://www.brianslens.blogspot.com/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/18/jimmy_carters_favor_98361.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/09/18/jimmy_carters_favor_98361.html</a></p>
<p>where he states:  &#8221; I can say in plain language that Jimmy Carter was right in essence, but wrong in degree. It seems clear to me that some &#8212; but not &#8220;an overwhelming portion,&#8221; as Carter claimed &#8212; of the &#8220;intensely demonstrated animosity&#8221; toward Obama is indeed &#8220;based on the fact that he is a black man.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>also linked at: <a href="http://www.brianslens.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brianslens.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182004</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182004</guid>
		<description>Which Robinson column?  He&#039;s been out there saying that the opposition ISN&#039;T driven by racism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which Robinson column?  He&#8217;s been out there saying that the opposition ISN&#8217;T driven by racism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-182000</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-182000</guid>
		<description>Sir, I never labeled you as a racist.  I have yet to label anyone as a racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I never labeled you as a racist.  I have yet to label anyone as a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181940</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181940</guid>
		<description>Maybe people are really racist against white people, and hate Obama because he had a white mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe people are really racist against white people, and hate Obama because he had a white mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181939</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181939</guid>
		<description>It would appear that the Left is trying to redefine racism as something good.  If they succeed, I don&#039;t know what word we will use to describe people who believe in an inherent superiority or inferiority of races.  &quot;Progressive&quot; maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that the Left is trying to redefine racism as something good.  If they succeed, I don&#8217;t know what word we will use to describe people who believe in an inherent superiority or inferiority of races.  &#8220;Progressive&#8221; maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piefarmer</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181929</link>
		<dc:creator>piefarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181929</guid>
		<description>For the racism charge to be taken seriously, Obama would have had to change his race from what it was during campaign.  

The entire issue is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the racism charge to be taken seriously, Obama would have had to change his race from what it was during campaign.  </p>
<p>The entire issue is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181904</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181904</guid>
		<description>For one thing I agreed with most people here on Carter - so if their thoughts on Carter were valid contributions than my first paragraph was a valid contribution.  As for my second paragraph - it added a hell of a lot more than this childish outburst of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For one thing I agreed with most people here on Carter &#8211; so if their thoughts on Carter were valid contributions than my first paragraph was a valid contribution.  As for my second paragraph &#8211; it added a hell of a lot more than this childish outburst of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hamilt0n</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181903</link>
		<dc:creator>hamilt0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181903</guid>
		<description>DK, fuck. why do you write such worthless shit? did anyone learn anything from what you said? was anything contributed to the discussion? if not, can you please shut up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DK, fuck. why do you write such worthless shit? did anyone learn anything from what you said? was anything contributed to the discussion? if not, can you please shut up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181861</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181861</guid>
		<description>Here is Bob Herbert&#039;s column today....it practically writes itself. Of course Dan will come in and say that Bob Herbert doesn&#039;t represent the Dem party. Yeah right!&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/opinion/19herbert.html?_r=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/opinion/19her...&lt;/a&gt;

&quot;For many white Americans, Barack Obama is nothing more than that black guy in the White House, and they want him out of there. &quot;
Who&#039;s blanketing whom Dan? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is Bob Herbert&#8217;s column today&#8230;.it practically writes itself. Of course Dan will come in and say that Bob Herbert doesn&#8217;t represent the Dem party. Yeah right!<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/opinion/19herbert.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/19/opinion/19her&#8230;</a></p>
<p>&#8220;For many white Americans, Barack Obama is nothing more than that black guy in the White House, and they want him out of there. &#8221;<br />
Who&#8217;s blanketing whom Dan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181854</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181854</guid>
		<description>Jimmy Carter, Eugene Robinson, Maureen Dowd, and Bob Herbert all have two things in common: 


1. They are Obama supporters 
2. They’ve all stated recently that varying degrees of the criticism directed towards Obama are motivated by racism.

I suspect they have a third thing in common also: They want Obama’s critics to be racists. 

Please note that I said I suspect that they want it, not that they do. I am no more able to see into their hidden desires and motivations then they are able to see into Joe Wilson, or anyone else they associate racism to based on criticism of Obama’s administration. 

Assigning racial motives to any criticism of Obama, however, does afford them some benefits. It allows them to feel morally superior, to look down on someone as a backwards bigot. To the extent someone is a backwards bigot, and you are not, you should feel morally superior. But only to the extent that both of those are true. If someone isn’t motivated by racism in criticizing Obama, however, and you look down on them as a racist, I think you’ve lost more than a little of your moral high ground. 

It also spares them of having to deal with the inconvenient reality that whatever proposal of Obama’s is being criticized may actually make things worse. An honest, objective assessment of whatever it is may lead you to the conclusion that, in that particular instance, Obama is wrong. Really understanding an issue honestly and objectively, however, takes a lot of work. You can certainly spare someone having to do that work by dismissing any criticism of Obamacare, for example, as racially motivated. 

I have no doubt there are people in America who can&#039;t stand Obama because he&#039;s black. But what of those who criticize Obama based on a different view of the role of government than he&#039;s been promoting? Joe Wilson&#039;s pathetic outburst may be viewed by some as a gift to be exploited... an opportunity to change the discussion away from the wisdom of an expanded federal role in health care to the racial motivations of those who question that role.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy Carter, Eugene Robinson, Maureen Dowd, and Bob Herbert all have two things in common: </p>
<p>1. They are Obama supporters<br />
2. They’ve all stated recently that varying degrees of the criticism directed towards Obama are motivated by racism.</p>
<p>I suspect they have a third thing in common also: They want Obama’s critics to be racists. </p>
<p>Please note that I said I suspect that they want it, not that they do. I am no more able to see into their hidden desires and motivations then they are able to see into Joe Wilson, or anyone else they associate racism to based on criticism of Obama’s administration. </p>
<p>Assigning racial motives to any criticism of Obama, however, does afford them some benefits. It allows them to feel morally superior, to look down on someone as a backwards bigot. To the extent someone is a backwards bigot, and you are not, you should feel morally superior. But only to the extent that both of those are true. If someone isn’t motivated by racism in criticizing Obama, however, and you look down on them as a racist, I think you’ve lost more than a little of your moral high ground. </p>
<p>It also spares them of having to deal with the inconvenient reality that whatever proposal of Obama’s is being criticized may actually make things worse. An honest, objective assessment of whatever it is may lead you to the conclusion that, in that particular instance, Obama is wrong. Really understanding an issue honestly and objectively, however, takes a lot of work. You can certainly spare someone having to do that work by dismissing any criticism of Obamacare, for example, as racially motivated. </p>
<p>I have no doubt there are people in America who can&#8217;t stand Obama because he&#8217;s black. But what of those who criticize Obama based on a different view of the role of government than he&#8217;s been promoting? Joe Wilson&#8217;s pathetic outburst may be viewed by some as a gift to be exploited&#8230; an opportunity to change the discussion away from the wisdom of an expanded federal role in health care to the racial motivations of those who question that role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181828</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181828</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;To be honest she&#039;s closer to yours, just for the other team.&quot; 
HA That is rich...trying to throw her under the bus already. Not that I can blame you, but sorry Dan she is all your Party. 

I agree with your second paragraph though. This kneejerk partisan reaction to everything is highly destructive. I would argue though that most, not all, of the kneejerk reaction comes from the Left. Your Bush example, and the current racism example I offer as proof. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;To be honest she&#8217;s closer to yours, just for the other team.&#8221;<br />
HA That is rich&#8230;trying to throw her under the bus already. Not that I can blame you, but sorry Dan she is all your Party. </p>
<p>I agree with your second paragraph though. This kneejerk partisan reaction to everything is highly destructive. I would argue though that most, not all, of the kneejerk reaction comes from the Left. Your Bush example, and the current racism example I offer as proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin P</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/racism.html/comment-page-1#comment-181827</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6497#comment-181827</guid>
		<description>Your implication that I am one of &quot;those people&quot; that file frivolous racial lawsuits is enough. 

I never said I see racism everywhere. I said that Democrats use the race card when ever it suits them. My evidence for this was Obama&#039;s use againts Clinton and Ferraro. Hank Johnson&#039;s recent comments, Carter&#039;s recent comments, Jesse Jackson&#039;s and Al Sharpton&#039;s whole careers...there are more but I&#039;m being too lazy right now to type them out....I know Methinks can and will come up with more examples. 
I also said that, I think the real racists are the one&#039;s that go around looking for it in every nook and cranny. Did I ever say that I go around looking for it? Your trying to imply something that I never said. Which in turn is trying to use my words to label me as a racist. I don&#039;t really appreciate that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your implication that I am one of &#8220;those people&#8221; that file frivolous racial lawsuits is enough. </p>
<p>I never said I see racism everywhere. I said that Democrats use the race card when ever it suits them. My evidence for this was Obama&#8217;s use againts Clinton and Ferraro. Hank Johnson&#8217;s recent comments, Carter&#8217;s recent comments, Jesse Jackson&#8217;s and Al Sharpton&#8217;s whole careers&#8230;there are more but I&#8217;m being too lazy right now to type them out&#8230;.I know Methinks can and will come up with more examples.<br />
I also said that, I think the real racists are the one&#8217;s that go around looking for it in every nook and cranny. Did I ever say that I go around looking for it? Your trying to imply something that I never said. Which in turn is trying to use my words to label me as a racist. I don&#8217;t really appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

