<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stossel on Health-Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-179936</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6164#comment-179936</guid>
		<description>Here is today&#039;s opinion in the NYT about why government is so capable of successfully providing national health care.  http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/opinion/03kristof.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion

My thought is that the examples of police departments and fire departments are not appropriate since those are local organizations that are accountable to the local community.  A federal healthcare system is not the same, and as such, would not be effective.

Medicare is held out as a great example of government success.  It does seem like people who have Medicare like it because it provides good coverage.  But the medical professionals who provide the care and get paid by Medicare, at least it is my perception, do not like it since the reimbursements are so low.  Plus the system is going bankrupt, so that is not my idea of success.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is today&#8217;s opinion in the NYT about why government is so capable of successfully providing national health care.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/opinion/03kristof.html?_r=1&#038;ref=opinion" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/opinion/03kristof.html?_r=1&#038;ref=opinion</a></p>
<p>My thought is that the examples of police departments and fire departments are not appropriate since those are local organizations that are accountable to the local community.  A federal healthcare system is not the same, and as such, would not be effective.</p>
<p>Medicare is held out as a great example of government success.  It does seem like people who have Medicare like it because it provides good coverage.  But the medical professionals who provide the care and get paid by Medicare, at least it is my perception, do not like it since the reimbursements are so low.  Plus the system is going bankrupt, so that is not my idea of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-179775</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6164#comment-179775</guid>
		<description>Except Major Garrett hardly ever gave tough questions to his neoconservative constituents.

http://www.newshounds.us/2004/12/01/major_garre...

He promoted big government under Bush and has turned the page because a different party is in power. John Stossel is way above Major Garrett&#039;s league when it comes to journalism credibility. 

Nice job at the ad hominem attack. Shows real lack of a defendable position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except Major Garrett hardly ever gave tough questions to his neoconservative constituents.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2004/12/01/major_garre.." rel="nofollow">http://www.newshounds.us/2004/12/01/major_garre..</a>.</p>
<p>He promoted big government under Bush and has turned the page because a different party is in power. John Stossel is way above Major Garrett&#8217;s league when it comes to journalism credibility. </p>
<p>Nice job at the ad hominem attack. Shows real lack of a defendable position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-179774</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6164#comment-179774</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-179770</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6164#comment-179770</guid>
		<description>You know spammers are getting desperate when they start spamming econ blogs with Ugg ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know spammers are getting desperate when they start spamming econ blogs with Ugg ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuvain Borchardt</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/09/stossel-on-health-care.html/comment-page-1#comment-179712</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuvain Borchardt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6164#comment-179712</guid>
		<description>@austroliberal 

This discussion wasn&#039;t addressing any reporter&#039;s personal political views; this discussion is about whether reporters do their jobs in questioning politicians and gov&#039;t policies, or are simply spokesmen for said politicians.

To that end, Garrett does a good job. Whether he is personally a liberal, conservative, libertarian, neocon, socialist, statist or whatever is completely irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@austroliberal </p>
<p>This discussion wasn&#8217;t addressing any reporter&#8217;s personal political views; this discussion is about whether reporters do their jobs in questioning politicians and gov&#8217;t policies, or are simply spokesmen for said politicians.</p>
<p>To that end, Garrett does a good job. Whether he is personally a liberal, conservative, libertarian, neocon, socialist, statist or whatever is completely irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

