The Academic-Man’s Burden

by Don Boudreaux on September 8, 2009

in Immigration, Man of System, Reality Is Not Optional, Regulation, Seen and Unseen, Work

Here’s a letter that I sent this morning to the New York Times:

Responding to a study that finds that low-wage workers routinely remain in jobs at which their employers violate employment regulations such as the minimum-wage, Gary Chaison argues that “Only through comprehensive ‘rights training’ can we truly empower workers to demand their rights at work” (Letters, September 8).

Prof. Chaison’s claim is implausible.  Seventy percent of the workers in that study are immigrants, and four in seven of these are ‘illegal.’  These people are far from being unaware, passive drones.  They left their native lands – presumably without any “rights training” – to find better jobs in the United States.  There’s no reason to suppose that the work conditions and pay they now receive (although deemed inadequate by politicians and academics) are not the best that are available to them given their skill levels and legal status.

Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux

Comments    Share Share    Print Print    Email Email

  • SheetWise
    I don't know why my follow-up comment didn't post -- but I'm smart enough to know that there's no such thing as an unskilled worker, and I apologize for the reference. It was a bad choice of words. OTOH -- these (+/-) minimum wage workers may have more skills than our domestic team is capable of dealing with.

    You only need to dwell on that for a moment before you take a position on immigration and borders.

    I'm going to take a break and see if TVLand is playing some reruns of Andy and Opie.
  • SheetWise
    More interesting questions would be why 70 percent of the respondents were immigrants. Is this normal among minimum wage workers? If so, are legal and illegal immigrants included in the teenage unemployment figures? If not, domestic unemployment figures must be drastically higher than what's reported -- if so, domestic workers must really feel frustrated by the competition (!? linguistically challenged unskilled workers).

    The only thing that makes sense to me is that the sampling is very suspect.
  • "Prof. Chaison’s claim is implausible."

    So is the notion that we can increase the amount of health care provided to a larger pool of people with no appreciable gain in the number of providers for a fraction of the current cost.

    Since when has that stopped the dreamers?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: