<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobel announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG Lesvic</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-185529</link>
		<dc:creator>DG Lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6833#comment-185529</guid>
		<description>Ben Atlas,

Very good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Atlas,</p>
<p>Very good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vog</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-185472</link>
		<dc:creator>Vog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6833#comment-185472</guid>
		<description>Note this is not a Nobel but a Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note this is not a Nobel but a Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-185468</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6833#comment-185468</guid>
		<description>Well they&#039;re most famous for doing work on how non-market, non-government relations and institutions can manage resources and commons.  But I doubt either of them have completely rejected market or government management of resources out of hand either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they&#8217;re most famous for doing work on how non-market, non-government relations and institutions can manage resources and commons.  But I doubt either of them have completely rejected market or government management of resources out of hand either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meisenzahl</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-185466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meisenzahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6833#comment-185466</guid>
		<description>Did one of them do something with attempting to justify govt. interaction in markets and the tragedy of the commons, or something similar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did one of them do something with attempting to justify govt. interaction in markets and the tragedy of the commons, or something similar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/nobel-announced.html/comment-page-1#comment-185465</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=6833#comment-185465</guid>
		<description>That was great news!  These two are very innovative thinkers.  I heard the other day that the odds were in Eugene Fama&#039;s favor.  That would have been the definition of a tin-ear choice on the part of the Nobel Committee - even worse than the farsical Obama choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was great news!  These two are very innovative thinkers.  I heard the other day that the odds were in Eugene Fama&#8217;s favor.  That would have been the definition of a tin-ear choice on the part of the Nobel Committee &#8211; even worse than the farsical Obama choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

