Comments on: Nye on Income Differences

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:50:00 +0000

Hey now – those cranial rectosis treatments are very important. We all oughta pitch in.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 05:08:00 +0000

Daniel,

If you believe that it’s the proper role of government to take money from me to pay for Yasafi’s Cranial Rectosis treatments, then you’re a socialist.

By: DG Lesvic

DG Lesvic — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:57:00 +0000

It’s too bad they weren’t giving cash for intellectual clunkers.

You boys could have been worth something.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:51:00 +0000

Wow – I’d be really depressed if I walked around thinking the socialists are winning by that much. I think you’re probably overstating the case.

Oh wait… I’m in that socialist category for you, right? Well given everyone you include in “socialist”, ya you’re right – we probably are up by that much.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:49:00 +0000

At least he’s consistent (and therefore easy to follow) on this “masterstroke” point.

In “More on the 2009 Nobel Prize in Economics” he ridiculed GMU’s interest in experimental economics, and in “Experimental Public Choice” he offered them a donation to support it.

By: Gil

Gil — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:23:00 +0000

Aw what? Not even Don will support your ‘masterstroke’.

By: DG Lesvic

DG Lesvic — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:14:00 +0000

Gil, in your case, I do mean loosertarian, for you have a few screws loose.

And Arrowhead (in your case I mean Lunkhead), you could use a bit of tightening up, too.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:18:00 +0000

You listen to that idiot Michael Medved.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:18:00 +0000

You mean in the virtual world? Socialists are up 100000000-0 in the real world.

By: Gil

Gil — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:14:00 +0000

Why? Are you seeing your ‘masterstroke’ taking shots from all directions?

By: DG Lesvic

DG Lesvic — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:59:00 +0000

I meant losertarian, not loosertarian.

By: DG Lesvic

DG Lesvic — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:38:00 +0000

Another loosertarian, who would rather remain on the defensive than go on the offensive.

By: Justin P

Justin P — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:58:00 +0000

The grass is always greener on the other side, if you have a lawn.

Why are “we” arguing about Global Warming, because capitalism has provided enough food, that we aren’t always looking for food to eat.

Do people really realize what would happen if they got their “wish?”

By: MikeM

MikeM — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:46:00 +0000

Nye hit that one out of the park. Made Lane Kenworthy’s post seem silly.

I look for forward to Elizabeth Andersen’s response, but so far it looks like the libertarians are up 2-nil.