Comments on: Scientific Consensus http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html/comment-page-1#comment-184603 Anonymous Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:27:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=6711#comment-184603 "a man much criticized by libertarians" And Objectivists. The only one's praising Greenspan have been Republicrats. “a man much criticized by libertarians”

And Objectivists. The only one’s praising Greenspan have been Republicrats.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html/comment-page-1#comment-184602 Anonymous Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:26:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=6711#comment-184602 You should've asked him for the correlation between asthma prevalence and catalytic converter use. Using his own usual logic, you'd have to blame asthma on catalytic converters. You should’ve asked him for the correlation between asthma prevalence and catalytic converter use. Using his own usual logic, you’d have to blame asthma on catalytic converters.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html/comment-page-1#comment-184566 Anonymous Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:19:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=6711#comment-184566 The global warming hysteria, and the entire "green" movement, are merely attempts at bringing back a justification for command economies. It's political through and through. The global warming hysteria, and the entire “green” movement, are merely attempts at bringing back a justification for command economies. It’s political through and through.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html/comment-page-1#comment-184377 Anonymous Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:17:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=6711#comment-184377 No Russ, it's about a large Power Grab. In the 70s CO2 caused cooling and now it causes warming. No matter which way the weather goes, evnironmentalists state that it's the wrong direction and man is to blame. The solution always envolves taxing big business. CO2 is necessary for life. Most stupid environmentalists don't even know the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. CO2 is something we exhale, plants need it to survie and gives us oxygen in return. Great relationship huh? Commercial greenhouses keep the CO2 levels high because of the benefit to plants. What are those benefits you might ask Russ? Thanks for asking, larger, healthier plants that need less water and are more heat resistant. They also yield larger, higher quality fruits and vegetables. Really sounds like a pollutant doesn't it? Ever hear any of this on the evening news Russ? Me either. It should also be noted that the planet is currently cooling. Only when one relies on highly incomplete surface data or highly flawed computer models does it seem as that the world might not be cooling. That hasn't gotten a lot of press either. Here is another link for you: http://www.hootervillegazette.com/GlobalWarming.html No Russ, it’s about a large Power Grab. In the 70s CO2 caused cooling and now it causes warming. No matter which way the weather goes, evnironmentalists state that it’s the wrong direction and man is to blame. The solution always envolves taxing big business. CO2 is necessary for life. Most stupid environmentalists don’t even know the difference between carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. CO2 is something we exhale, plants need it to survie and gives us oxygen in return. Great relationship huh? Commercial greenhouses keep the CO2 levels high because of the benefit to plants. What are those benefits you might ask Russ? Thanks for asking, larger, healthier plants that need less water and are more heat resistant. They also yield larger, higher quality fruits and vegetables. Really sounds like a pollutant doesn’t it? Ever hear any of this on the evening news Russ? Me either.

It should also be noted that the planet is currently cooling. Only when one relies on highly incomplete surface data or highly flawed computer models does it seem as that the world might not be cooling. That hasn’t gotten a lot of press either. Here is another link for you:

http://www.hootervillegazette.com/GlobalWarming.html

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/10/scientific-consensus.html/comment-page-1#comment-184375 Anonymous Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:05:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=6711#comment-184375 I've never paid attention one way or the other Russ. When I interviewed Phelim McAleer, his point was that environmentalists are pretty casual about the deaths of black people. I had asked him if the 30,000,000 deaths reportedly caused when environmentalists succeeded in getting DDT banned in most countries was an exaggeration. He asked me how many deaths would be acceptable: a million, two million, etc... His wife Ann McElhinney said she's seen environmentalists crying over a dwindling lemur population when starving children were only a few feet away. She asked them if they had noticed the starving children and they just looked at her like she was crazy. Here is a clip you need to see: http://www.hootervillegazette.com/evilal.html As for your original question Russ, I think most of them are spoiled college kids who value animal life and plant life over human life. It really doesn't matter to me what color they are. Here are two clips of some young clueless evironmentalists: http://www.liberalmadness.com/video/enviro-1 http://www.liberalmadness.com/video/enviro-2 The second video to me is the funniest, suggesting environmentalist are just out to have a good time. Warning!!!! These vids were done by Penn & Teller and the language is PG-13, maybe even R Rated. They do however make a strong point. I’ve never paid attention one way or the other Russ. When I interviewed Phelim McAleer, his point was that environmentalists are pretty casual about the deaths of black people. I had asked him if the 30,000,000 deaths reportedly caused when environmentalists succeeded in getting DDT banned in most countries was an exaggeration. He asked me how many deaths would be acceptable: a million, two million, etc… His wife Ann McElhinney said she’s seen environmentalists crying over a dwindling lemur population when starving children were only a few feet away. She asked them if they had noticed the starving children and they just looked at her like she was crazy. Here is a clip you need to see: http://www.hootervillegazette.com/evilal.html

As for your original question Russ, I think most of them are spoiled college kids who value animal life and plant life over human life. It really doesn’t matter to me what color they are. Here are two clips of some young clueless evironmentalists:

http://www.liberalmadness.com/video/enviro-1
http://www.liberalmadness.com/video/enviro-2

The second video to me is the funniest, suggesting environmentalist are just out to have a good time.

Warning!!!! These vids were done by Penn & Teller and the language is PG-13, maybe even R Rated. They do however make a strong point.

]]>