I Didn’t Vote!

by Don Boudreaux on November 6, 2009

in Myths and Fallacies,Politics

Commenting on this post, Nathaniel asks me to re-post this essay (entitled “I Won’t Vote!”) — or, I think that this is the essay he’s asking about.  Then again, perhaps it’s not, because a (confessedly very) quick look turns up no evidence that I posted it earlier.

Or maybe the link at this post contains the essay Nathaniel has in mind.

View Comments    Share Share    Print Print    Email Email

{ 23 comments }

1 Randy November 6, 2009 at 10:46 am

I don't vote because I don't want to. But its more than that. I have a right to not want to, and to not do what I don't want to do. So for me, voting would be a tacit admission that I belong to the state, that I buy the propaganda of the state's men, that I accept their moral premise. I don't.

2 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 10:49 am

I vote a straight Libertarian ticket as a means to undermine our rigged election system.

3 Methinks1776 November 6, 2009 at 10:50 am

Your means is not achieving your desired end.

4 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 10:51 am

Yeah, but it does give me some psychological satisfaction. I think of it as giving the election system the finger. :)

5 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 10:56 am

One thing I would love some MSM reporter to ask the President or future Presidential candidates is their position on ballot access laws. Something like “Do you agree that ballot access are too restrictive, undermine choice and are a means by which corruption ensues?”

6 Methinks1776 November 6, 2009 at 10:59 am

There's a lot to be said for psychological satisfaction. It does have a much bigger impact on you than your vote does on the election. Congratulations on finding a way to extract the maximum benefit from your vote, sir :)

7 muirgeo November 6, 2009 at 10:59 am

It's not undermining the system. I would like to believe that if greater then 50% of the people voted for a libertarian candidate he/she would be elected and put into office.

I think a great idea would be for independents of all ideologies to start a campaign to NOT vote for either of the major parties. Vote … definitely vote but for some one other then a major party candidate.

8 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 11:02 am

*LOL*

9 JohnK November 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

An intelligent post from muirgeo… call Guinness!

10 Randy November 6, 2009 at 11:19 am

It does undermine the system, or more precisely, it undermines the propaganda of the system. Disrespect has brought down many a seemingly invinceable regime and the Progressives will be no exception. You know its true, or you wouldn't bother to comment here.

11 danielkuehn November 6, 2009 at 11:20 am
12 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 11:35 am

Voting LP also really ticks off Democrat and Republican partisans too.

“You did what? You wasted your vote? You fool!”

13 danielkuehn November 6, 2009 at 11:36 am

partisans deserve to be ticked off. it's essentially what they signed up for – to be perpetually offended.

14 Methinks1776 November 6, 2009 at 11:56 am

You should tell them your motivation (psychological satisfaction) and then throw in that the alternative was not voting at all. Just for fun.

15 Mommsen1625 November 6, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Ha ha ha. :)

Voting is one of those strange things that is really “important” as a societal norm yet it isn't. There are a number of areas of life like this that would boggle some neutral third party.

16 ArrowSmith November 6, 2009 at 4:54 pm

The first comment my muirbot that vaguely makes any sense in about 3 years.

17 ArrowSmith November 6, 2009 at 4:56 pm

No matter what I think libertarian-minded people are screwed. We get the option to vote for a Republican, but that's a losing proposition as most GOPers are big tax-and-spend liberals anyways. Essentially America has lurched to the left big time the last few years and it's time to hunker down, shift assets to gold.

18 ArrowSmith November 6, 2009 at 7:00 pm

Except your signal strength is very low, so the system just shrugs.

19 LibertyZero November 6, 2009 at 10:47 pm

What we need is instant runoff voting. I deplore holding my nose when I go in to vote. It's a slap in the face to everyone who has ever felt he had to vote against, rather than for, a candidate.

20 Eric H November 7, 2009 at 7:51 am

Don–

How do you square this position with your rationale for working at an institution that receives state funds?

I'm not trying to call you out on this, because you are free to do whatever you want. But I think I know the answer. The marginal value of your vote as a freedom lover is tiny, while the marginal value of your teaching hour is high. You are able to influence more people through teaching and writing than voting. Essentially, your civic-minded students vote for you by proxy. That is, until they come around to your way of thinking!

I think your position is commendable, but it's also disheartening. One of my knee jerk responses to your Freeman piece was “This is why libertarians get so little political traction.” Thinking about it for awhile, my considered response is “libertarians get so little political traction because getting political traction isn't what life is all about.”

21 Nathaniel November 17, 2009 at 1:08 pm

I just noticed this post as I was scrolling through my Google Reader. I must have missed it at the time–not sure how that happened. Either way, thanks for granting the request!

22 Nathaniel November 17, 2009 at 4:08 pm

I just noticed this post as I was scrolling through my Google Reader. I must have missed it at the time–not sure how that happened. Either way, thanks for granting the request!

23 Nathaniel November 17, 2009 at 9:08 pm

I just noticed this post as I was scrolling through my Google Reader. I must have missed it at the time–not sure how that happened. Either way, thanks for granting the request!

Comments on this entry are closed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: