<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jacoby On Immigrants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191561</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191561</guid>
		<description>Dont mix up issues,immigration and traffic lights are not the same,Immigtation involves alot of issues to the conceptual mind far more than a traffic stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont mix up issues,immigration and traffic lights are not the same,Immigtation involves alot of issues to the conceptual mind far more than a traffic stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191559</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191559</guid>
		<description>&quot;...so too does the U.S. expect people to wait at the &#039;front door&#039; to get a green card.&quot;

That&#039;s just it... there is no &#039;front door&#039; for these people and as long as there isn&#039;t, they&#039;ll come across the southern border.

&quot;Most illegals think they can jump in and magically find the good life they see on TV only to become an underground slave to some dodgy employer paying them a pittance cash in the hand.&quot;

I&#039;m guessing you don&#039;t live in a border state...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;so too does the U.S. expect people to wait at the &#8216;front door&#8217; to get a green card.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just it&#8230; there is no &#8216;front door&#8217; for these people and as long as there isn&#8217;t, they&#8217;ll come across the southern border.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most illegals think they can jump in and magically find the good life they see on TV only to become an underground slave to some dodgy employer paying them a pittance cash in the hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you don&#8217;t live in a border state&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191558</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191558</guid>
		<description>Hence the term &#039;front door&#039; - just as a person who wants to get on your property presents himself at your front door for you to decide to let him in or not so too does the U.S. expect people to wait at the &#039;front door&#039; to get a green card.  No, I&#039;m you &amp; your friends MWG would love to have a flood of immigrants south of the border who will overload the systems of government and create a giant pool of cheap labour.  Most illegals think they can jump in and magically find the good life they see on TV only to become an underground slave to some dodgy employer paying them a pittance cash in the hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hence the term &#8216;front door&#8217; &#8211; just as a person who wants to get on your property presents himself at your front door for you to decide to let him in or not so too does the U.S. expect people to wait at the &#8216;front door&#8217; to get a green card.  No, I&#8217;m you &amp; your friends MWG would love to have a flood of immigrants south of the border who will overload the systems of government and create a giant pool of cheap labour.  Most illegals think they can jump in and magically find the good life they see on TV only to become an underground slave to some dodgy employer paying them a pittance cash in the hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191551</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191551</guid>
		<description>&quot;...so too the U.S.A. doesn&#039;t have a duty to soak every &#039;economic refugee&#039; in the world.&quot; 

Basic economics... I don&#039;t see it as a duty... more as an opportunity. Of course no one would ever accuse you of understanding basic economics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;so too the U.S.A. doesn&#8217;t have a duty to soak every &#8216;economic refugee&#8217; in the world.&#8221; </p>
<p>Basic economics&#8230; I don&#8217;t see it as a duty&#8230; more as an opportunity. Of course no one would ever accuse you of understanding basic economics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191549</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191549</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191534</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191534</guid>
		<description>I suspect that if the welfare state went away, the anti-&quot;illegal&quot; immigration crowd would find some other justification for keeping the brown people out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that if the welfare state went away, the anti-&#8221;illegal&#8221; immigration crowd would find some other justification for keeping the brown people out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191533</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191533</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s a moral right to break unjust laws. It doesn&#039;t meant the powers that be won&#039;t punish you, or even kill you. It means that no matter how it turns out, you will be justified (albeit jailed or dead), and the &quot;authorities&quot; will be the true criminals. Might doesn&#039;t make right. Kangaroo courts punish dissidents the world over, but that in no way means they are legitimate arbiters of justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s a moral right to break unjust laws. It doesn&#8217;t meant the powers that be won&#8217;t punish you, or even kill you. It means that no matter how it turns out, you will be justified (albeit jailed or dead), and the &#8220;authorities&#8221; will be the true criminals. Might doesn&#8217;t make right. Kangaroo courts punish dissidents the world over, but that in no way means they are legitimate arbiters of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191532</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191532</guid>
		<description>So the eff what?  I&#039;m sure you would treat a visitor who came to your front door and rang the bell differently from someone who is crawling through your back window.  Who cares if people break the law - if they caught they pay the price.  People who are stupid enough to risk death in the desert won&#039;t take on their own government who supposedly stifles their personal economic development.  Just as you don&#039;t have a duty to let in any one who is at your front regardless of their circumstances so too the U.S.A. doesn&#039;t have a duty to soak every &#039;economic refugee&#039; in the world.  The right to leave your home to doesn&#039;t give you the right to enter someone else home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the eff what?  I&#8217;m sure you would treat a visitor who came to your front door and rang the bell differently from someone who is crawling through your back window.  Who cares if people break the law &#8211; if they caught they pay the price.  People who are stupid enough to risk death in the desert won&#8217;t take on their own government who supposedly stifles their personal economic development.  Just as you don&#8217;t have a duty to let in any one who is at your front regardless of their circumstances so too the U.S.A. doesn&#8217;t have a duty to soak every &#8216;economic refugee&#8217; in the world.  The right to leave your home to doesn&#8217;t give you the right to enter someone else home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191520</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191520</guid>
		<description>&quot;You speak as if compassion is completely incompatible with uniform application of border security.&quot;

Actually I speak from a standpoint of COLD, HARD reason. I&#039;ll cut and paste it so you can read it again. This time, read it slow so you&#039;ll be sure to understand.

&quot;As I said before, (and as you seem to recognize) the ONLY way to keep people from trying to cross the border illegally is to establish the kind of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and that currently exists on the border between N. Korea and China.&quot;

You can be all for this sort of policy, and it seems that you are. I simply think it&#039;s a policy best kept solely by brutal despotic regimes.

&quot;Those border jumpers aren&#039;t exactly angels, and the people who bring them across only care if their headcount pays up.&quot;

I haven&#039;t made the argument that they all are, though as a resident of AZ and someone who has had regular contact with people who both came here illegally and are now citizens, and those who are here illegally still, I can say that many of them love this country and contribute to it every bit as a pure-blooded American. They&#039;re not all angels, but they&#039;re also not all shady criminals.

&quot;Besides, the only large rush to Mexico I see are &#039;people&#039; that don&#039;t want the public to know that they&#039;re headed to Mexico. They lie to their domestic workers about those &#039;additional workers&#039; or their &#039;new expansion&#039; when they don&#039;t have the cash; they try to whitewash with their PR department when they&#039;re outed. These &#039;people&#039; rush to Mexico because it is a pliable, corrupt narcostate.&quot;

This part of your comment seems somewhat nonsensical. I don&#039;t know what it has to do with the flow of illegal immigrants into the US and how to solve that problem. Sorry.

&quot;If you wish to aid these people so much, go to Mexico and help them fix their nation from the inside.&quot;

You&#039;ve really missed the point of the debate. I&#039;m really not interested in fixing Mexico&#039;s social problems. I&#039;m more interested if figuring out a way that would allow people who want to come to the US to work to do so in a manner that would reduce the chaos on the southern border and help fuel the US economy. Pretty simple really...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You speak as if compassion is completely incompatible with uniform application of border security.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually I speak from a standpoint of COLD, HARD reason. I&#8217;ll cut and paste it so you can read it again. This time, read it slow so you&#8217;ll be sure to understand.</p>
<p>&#8220;As I said before, (and as you seem to recognize) the ONLY way to keep people from trying to cross the border illegally is to establish the kind of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and that currently exists on the border between N. Korea and China.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can be all for this sort of policy, and it seems that you are. I simply think it&#8217;s a policy best kept solely by brutal despotic regimes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Those border jumpers aren&#8217;t exactly angels, and the people who bring them across only care if their headcount pays up.&#8221;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t made the argument that they all are, though as a resident of AZ and someone who has had regular contact with people who both came here illegally and are now citizens, and those who are here illegally still, I can say that many of them love this country and contribute to it every bit as a pure-blooded American. They&#8217;re not all angels, but they&#8217;re also not all shady criminals.</p>
<p>&#8220;Besides, the only large rush to Mexico I see are &#8216;people&#8217; that don&#8217;t want the public to know that they&#8217;re headed to Mexico. They lie to their domestic workers about those &#8216;additional workers&#8217; or their &#8216;new expansion&#8217; when they don&#8217;t have the cash; they try to whitewash with their PR department when they&#8217;re outed. These &#8216;people&#8217; rush to Mexico because it is a pliable, corrupt narcostate.&#8221;</p>
<p>This part of your comment seems somewhat nonsensical. I don&#8217;t know what it has to do with the flow of illegal immigrants into the US and how to solve that problem. Sorry.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you wish to aid these people so much, go to Mexico and help them fix their nation from the inside.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve really missed the point of the debate. I&#8217;m really not interested in fixing Mexico&#8217;s social problems. I&#8217;m more interested if figuring out a way that would allow people who want to come to the US to work to do so in a manner that would reduce the chaos on the southern border and help fuel the US economy. Pretty simple really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191516</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191516</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a question of whether or not people should have the &quot;right&quot; to immigrate to the US. 

Cut and pasted from another of my responses to you:

&quot;As I&#039;ve said MULTIPLE times to you, the ONLY way to reduce the flow of people crossing illegally (short of reforming current immigration laws so as to allow these people to come here legally) is to set up the same type of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and currently exists on the border of China and N. Korea. EVEN with the tough measures both China and N. Korea take against those who cross the border illegally, thousands still attempt it every year.&quot;

Gil: &quot;You could just as well say the banning of legal slavery has created a black market of underground slavery.&quot; 

You could could absolutely try and argue that we were better off WITH slavery as a result of some MASSIVE &quot;underground&quot; slave trade that exists today, though you will find few people who agree with you. 

I&#039;m arguing that we&#039;d be better off scrapping current immigration law that fuels a MASSIVE inflow of undocumented workers in favor of a policy that would allow those who wish to come here to work low-skilled jobs could do so legally.

Gil: &quot;If politics are the problem than the people of poor can die trying to overthrow the powers that be...&quot;

Seems reasonable. Now you go tell the man who&#039;s trying to feed his family, &quot;instead of crossing the border to work odd jobs, why don&#039;t you take up arms and lead a revolution against the Mexican govt.?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a question of whether or not people should have the &#8220;right&#8221; to immigrate to the US. </p>
<p>Cut and pasted from another of my responses to you:</p>
<p>&#8220;As I&#8217;ve said MULTIPLE times to you, the ONLY way to reduce the flow of people crossing illegally (short of reforming current immigration laws so as to allow these people to come here legally) is to set up the same type of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and currently exists on the border of China and N. Korea. EVEN with the tough measures both China and N. Korea take against those who cross the border illegally, thousands still attempt it every year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gil: &#8220;You could just as well say the banning of legal slavery has created a black market of underground slavery.&#8221; </p>
<p>You could could absolutely try and argue that we were better off WITH slavery as a result of some MASSIVE &#8220;underground&#8221; slave trade that exists today, though you will find few people who agree with you. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m arguing that we&#8217;d be better off scrapping current immigration law that fuels a MASSIVE inflow of undocumented workers in favor of a policy that would allow those who wish to come here to work low-skilled jobs could do so legally.</p>
<p>Gil: &#8220;If politics are the problem than the people of poor can die trying to overthrow the powers that be&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems reasonable. Now you go tell the man who&#8217;s trying to feed his family, &#8220;instead of crossing the border to work odd jobs, why don&#8217;t you take up arms and lead a revolution against the Mexican govt.?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191515</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191515</guid>
		<description>You speak as if compassion is completely incompatible with uniform application of border security.  It seems that to you, pointing something lethal (or less than) in one direction also points it in the other direction.  Those border jumpers aren&#039;t exactly angels, and the people who bring them across only care if their headcount pays up.Besides, the only large rush &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt; Mexico I see are &#039;people&#039; that don&#039;t want the public to know that they&#039;re headed to Mexico.  They lie to their domestic workers about those &#039;additional workers&#039; or their &#039;new expansion&#039; when they don&#039;t have the cash; they try to whitewash with their PR department when they&#039;re outed.  These &#039;people&#039; rush to Mexico because it is a pliable, corrupt narcostate.  If you wish to aid these people so much, go to Mexico and help them fix their nation from the inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You speak as if compassion is completely incompatible with uniform application of border security.  It seems that to you, pointing something lethal (or less than) in one direction also points it in the other direction.  Those border jumpers aren&#8217;t exactly angels, and the people who bring them across only care if their headcount pays up.Besides, the only large rush <i>to</i> Mexico I see are &#8216;people&#8217; that don&#8217;t want the public to know that they&#8217;re headed to Mexico.  They lie to their domestic workers about those &#8216;additional workers&#8217; or their &#8216;new expansion&#8217; when they don&#8217;t have the cash; they try to whitewash with their PR department when they&#8217;re outed.  These &#8216;people&#8217; rush to Mexico because it is a pliable, corrupt narcostate.  If you wish to aid these people so much, go to Mexico and help them fix their nation from the inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191512</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191512</guid>
		<description>&quot;How is that the problem of the U.S.A.?&quot;

You really are dense. 

It is a problem for the US in and as long as the US has a closed door policy to people who want to come here and make a living working as maids, doing yard work, and any other manner of low-skilled labor, thousands will continue to poor over the border illegally. As I&#039;ve said MULTIPLE times to you, the ONLY way to reduce the flow of people crossing illegally (short of reforming current immigration laws so as to allow these people to come here legally) is to set up the same type of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and currently exists on the border of China and N. Korea. EVEN with the tough measures both China and N. Korea take against those who cross the border illegally, thousands still attempt it every year.

&quot;Why don&#039;t poor people make something of themselves in their own country unless they&#039;re wholly unproductive people per se?&quot;

Because they&#039;re stupid, remember?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How is that the problem of the U.S.A.?&#8221;</p>
<p>You really are dense. </p>
<p>It is a problem for the US in and as long as the US has a closed door policy to people who want to come here and make a living working as maids, doing yard work, and any other manner of low-skilled labor, thousands will continue to poor over the border illegally. As I&#8217;ve said MULTIPLE times to you, the ONLY way to reduce the flow of people crossing illegally (short of reforming current immigration laws so as to allow these people to come here legally) is to set up the same type of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and currently exists on the border of China and N. Korea. EVEN with the tough measures both China and N. Korea take against those who cross the border illegally, thousands still attempt it every year.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why don&#8217;t poor people make something of themselves in their own country unless they&#8217;re wholly unproductive people per se?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because they&#8217;re stupid, remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191510</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191510</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m saying if you believe there a &#039;legal&#039; right to break the law then your lawyer has to say &quot;my client thought the laws were unjust&quot; and the judge would say &quot;fair enough all charges are dropped&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m saying if you believe there a &#8216;legal&#8217; right to break the law then your lawyer has to say &#8220;my client thought the laws were unjust&#8221; and the judge would say &#8220;fair enough all charges are dropped&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191509</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191509</guid>
		<description>A person has no more right to immigrate than a person has to enter someone&#039;s private property.  You could just as well say the banning of legal slavery has created a black market of underground slavery.  Tough shit!  Would you and your friends personally adopt the poor children of the world until you were all living on bread and butter?  If politics are the problem than the people of poor can die trying to overthrow the powers that be and make themselves than trying to graph a slice of the pie that the West has built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person has no more right to immigrate than a person has to enter someone&#8217;s private property.  You could just as well say the banning of legal slavery has created a black market of underground slavery.  Tough shit!  Would you and your friends personally adopt the poor children of the world until you were all living on bread and butter?  If politics are the problem than the people of poor can die trying to overthrow the powers that be and make themselves than trying to graph a slice of the pie that the West has built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191508</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191508</guid>
		<description>How is that the problem of the U.S.A.?  Why don&#039;t poor people make something of themselves in their own country unless they&#039;re wholly unproductive people per se?  If the people have voted and don&#039;t want to be the dumping ground of the world&#039;s poor then tough luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is that the problem of the U.S.A.?  Why don&#8217;t poor people make something of themselves in their own country unless they&#8217;re wholly unproductive people per se?  If the people have voted and don&#8217;t want to be the dumping ground of the world&#8217;s poor then tough luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191506</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191506</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you wish to enter, you come in through the door on my (clearly defined) terms.&quot;

Where&#039;s this &quot;door&quot; you speak of? You talk as if there&#039;s some place these people could go and get visas to come to the US and work if they were only willing to &#039;wait&#039; their turn in line. No such place exists, and the fact that you don&#039;t recognize that, shows your ignorance of current US immigration policy.

As I said before, (and as you seem to recognize) the ONLY way to keep people from trying to cross the border illegally is to establish the kind of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and that currently exists on the border between N. Korea and China. I think what happens along the N. Korean/Chinese border is disgusting. You, on the other hand seem to think it&#039;s perfectly reasonable... a difference in values I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you wish to enter, you come in through the door on my (clearly defined) terms.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s this &#8220;door&#8221; you speak of? You talk as if there&#8217;s some place these people could go and get visas to come to the US and work if they were only willing to &#8216;wait&#8217; their turn in line. No such place exists, and the fact that you don&#8217;t recognize that, shows your ignorance of current US immigration policy.</p>
<p>As I said before, (and as you seem to recognize) the ONLY way to keep people from trying to cross the border illegally is to establish the kind of border that existed with the Berlin Wall and that currently exists on the border between N. Korea and China. I think what happens along the N. Korean/Chinese border is disgusting. You, on the other hand seem to think it&#8217;s perfectly reasonable&#8230; a difference in values I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191490</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191490</guid>
		<description>Only if they refuse an order to not cross illegally, willfully ignore warning shots, and/or refuse any opportunity to go through the crossing and be documented.  That is plenty of room to differentiate between people who wish to contribute legally (and have nobody able to take advantage of them for lack of status), people whom are indeed permitted to enter but require alternate means of identification(read: you forgot your papers), and those whom can only be denied legal entry(read: you have been documented to be a threat by criminal record, are fugitives from other nations that the US recognizes).Of course, the better solution would be to use less than lethal force.  It would have be able to deny entry and the use of human shields.  It would also not lead to people waiting for a favorable politician to grant them amnesty. Either way, take this in mind:It is similar to how one may exist in a defined and defensible private space.  If you wish to enter, you come in through the door on my (clearly defined) terms. You do not simply jump the fence, barge in through the window, and expect me not to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if they refuse an order to not cross illegally, willfully ignore warning shots, and/or refuse any opportunity to go through the crossing and be documented.  That is plenty of room to differentiate between people who wish to contribute legally (and have nobody able to take advantage of them for lack of status), people whom are indeed permitted to enter but require alternate means of identification(read: you forgot your papers), and those whom can only be denied legal entry(read: you have been documented to be a threat by criminal record, are fugitives from other nations that the US recognizes).Of course, the better solution would be to use less than lethal force.  It would have be able to deny entry and the use of human shields.  It would also not lead to people waiting for a favorable politician to grant them amnesty. Either way, take this in mind:It is similar to how one may exist in a defined and defensible private space.  If you wish to enter, you come in through the door on my (clearly defined) terms. You do not simply jump the fence, barge in through the window, and expect me not to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191483</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191483</guid>
		<description>Gil, you can try and interpret seanooski&#039;s argument any way you want. The fact of the matter is that, just as bad policy regarding drugs has resulted in the DEATH of thousands, fuels a MASSIVE black market, and WASTES billions of tax payer dollars, so too does bad immigration policy. Every year hundreds DIE in the desert trying to cross the boarder, there is a MASSIVE black market in human trafficking, and the US government WASTES billions of tax dollars building a crappy wall trying to &quot;enforce&quot; its misguided immigration laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gil, you can try and interpret seanooski&#8217;s argument any way you want. The fact of the matter is that, just as bad policy regarding drugs has resulted in the DEATH of thousands, fuels a MASSIVE black market, and WASTES billions of tax payer dollars, so too does bad immigration policy. Every year hundreds DIE in the desert trying to cross the boarder, there is a MASSIVE black market in human trafficking, and the US government WASTES billions of tax dollars building a crappy wall trying to &#8220;enforce&#8221; its misguided immigration laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MWG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191482</link>
		<dc:creator>MWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191482</guid>
		<description>POOR people in POOR countries can&#039;t come to the US legally. That&#039;s why they come here illegally. You seem to be suggesting they need to &#039;get in line&#039; and come here legally. For the poor there is NO &#039;line&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>POOR people in POOR countries can&#8217;t come to the US legally. That&#8217;s why they come here illegally. You seem to be suggesting they need to &#8216;get in line&#8217; and come here legally. For the poor there is NO &#8216;line&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/jacoby-on-immigrants.html/comment-page-1#comment-191481</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7339#comment-191481</guid>
		<description>So I guess you could morally justify yourself as a drug dealer and could morally stop those who wish to trash your business.  Long live the Mexican Drug Lords and hope they can destroy the Mexican Government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess you could morally justify yourself as a drug dealer and could morally stop those who wish to trash your business.  Long live the Mexican Drug Lords and hope they can destroy the Mexican Government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

