<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:51:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mpohl</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69620</link>
		<dc:creator>mpohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69620</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.StopTheLooters.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.StopTheLooters.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.StopTheLooters.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.StopTheLooters.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69611</link>
		<dc:creator>JimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69611</guid>
		<description>I really feel that no discussion of the meltdown, at least by conservative or libertarians should ever exclude mentioning the horrific role of the govt. in the Community Reinvestment Act. Govt. requiring that these firms invest in &quot;sub prime&quot; loans in ever increasing amounts with acorn lawyers funded by the govt suing every firm to increase that lending to the extent that a large west coast financial firm spent nearly 200 million and 2 years trying to fight giving these loans and seeing it hopeless finally gave in. I don&#039;t know if these people are afraid to do more than mention it or what</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really feel that no discussion of the meltdown, at least by conservative or libertarians should ever exclude mentioning the horrific role of the govt. in the Community Reinvestment Act. Govt. requiring that these firms invest in &#8220;sub prime&#8221; loans in ever increasing amounts with acorn lawyers funded by the govt suing every firm to increase that lending to the extent that a large west coast financial firm spent nearly 200 million and 2 years trying to fight giving these loans and seeing it hopeless finally gave in. I don&#39;t know if these people are afraid to do more than mention it or what</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimG</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69608</link>
		<dc:creator>JimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69608</guid>
		<description>I really feel that no discussion of the meltdown, at least by conservative or libertarians should ever exclude mentioning the horrific role of the govt. in the Community Reinvestment Act. Govt. requiring that these firms invest in &quot;sub prime&quot; loans in ever increasing amounts with acorn lawyers funded by the govt suing every firm to increase that lending to the extent that a large west coast financial firm spent nearly 200 million and 2 years trying to fight giving these loans and seeing it hopeless finally gave in. I don&#039;t know if these people are afraid to do more than mention it or what</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really feel that no discussion of the meltdown, at least by conservative or libertarians should ever exclude mentioning the horrific role of the govt. in the Community Reinvestment Act. Govt. requiring that these firms invest in &#8220;sub prime&#8221; loans in ever increasing amounts with acorn lawyers funded by the govt suing every firm to increase that lending to the extent that a large west coast financial firm spent nearly 200 million and 2 years trying to fight giving these loans and seeing it hopeless finally gave in. I don&#39;t know if these people are afraid to do more than mention it or what</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeRulle</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69574</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeRulle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69574</guid>
		<description>Lloyd B. was speaking in non-sequiturs. Never trust a guy who begins by telling you he &quot;feels your pain&quot;. He defends GS by defending the concept of banks. An analogy might be Ted Bundy defending himself by saying knives are good things to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd B. was speaking in non-sequiturs. Never trust a guy who begins by telling you he &#8220;feels your pain&#8221;. He defends GS by defending the concept of banks. An analogy might be Ted Bundy defending himself by saying knives are good things to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superheater</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69523</link>
		<dc:creator>superheater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69523</guid>
		<description>This is bizarre. Investment banking is a public good??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bizarre. Investment banking is a public good??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinbrock</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69521</link>
		<dc:creator>martinbrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69521</guid>
		<description>Capitalism is as capitalism does, and capitalism does corporatism these days. &quot;Capitalism&quot; is a term of abuse coined by Marx. The classical liberals never used it. I advocate free markets, but I stopped calling myself a &quot;capitalist&quot; years ago. I&#039;d rather be a utopian advocating something that doesn&#039;t exist and possibly never will than a shill for Goldman Sachs and the Senate Banking Committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capitalism is as capitalism does, and capitalism does corporatism these days. &#8220;Capitalism&#8221; is a term of abuse coined by Marx. The classical liberals never used it. I advocate free markets, but I stopped calling myself a &#8220;capitalist&#8221; years ago. I&#39;d rather be a utopian advocating something that doesn&#39;t exist and possibly never will than a shill for Goldman Sachs and the Senate Banking Committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vidyohs</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69517</link>
		<dc:creator>vidyohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69517</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/apps/comics/showComic.mpl?date=2009/11/10&amp;name=Non_Sequitur_pan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.chron.com/apps/comics/showComic.mpl?...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chron.com/apps/comics/showComic.mpl?date=2009/11/10&#038;name=Non_Sequitur_pan" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.chron.com/apps/comics/showComic.mpl?.." rel="nofollow">http://www.chron.com/apps/comics/showComic.mpl?..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69498</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69498</guid>
		<description>Why should I waste my ire on him?  If the government is handing out obscenely huge amounts of our money, it only stands to simple economic reason that somebody will be there dressed up like a clown and shouting &quot;Pick me, Monty!&quot;  If the government is meddling in the marketplace, only a fool would be surprised that business leaders were eager to hand over their stockholders&#039; money to politicians who promised regulations, taxes and subsidies that hindered the competition and helped them.  (What stockholder would complain as long as the politicians delivered.  Indeed, they&#039;d quickly fire incompetent leaders who didn&#039;t buy the best politicians available.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should I waste my ire on him?  If the government is handing out obscenely huge amounts of our money, it only stands to simple economic reason that somebody will be there dressed up like a clown and shouting &#8220;Pick me, Monty!&#8221;  If the government is meddling in the marketplace, only a fool would be surprised that business leaders were eager to hand over their stockholders&#39; money to politicians who promised regulations, taxes and subsidies that hindered the competition and helped them.  (What stockholder would complain as long as the politicians delivered.  Indeed, they&#39;d quickly fire incompetent leaders who didn&#39;t buy the best politicians available.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69468</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69468</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The fight never changes its always the wealthy elite and powerful against the masses of people simply trying to make a good living.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tend to think of it as the political versus the productive, but yeah, same basic idea.  The problem is that the political types will always rule for the simple reason that being political (exploitation and manipulation) is what they are good at.  The productive class is good only at being productive.  So, generally speaking, we&#039;re screwed.  But I think that maybe we could try a strike.  The politicians really are dependant on us.  They won&#039;t admit it, of course, but they are.  It worked against the Soviet Union and it might work here too.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S. Government isn&#039;t the answer, its the problem.  Government is just a gathering place for those who exploit and manipulate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;The fight never changes its always the wealthy elite and powerful against the masses of people simply trying to make a good living.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I tend to think of it as the political versus the productive, but yeah, same basic idea.  The problem is that the political types will always rule for the simple reason that being political (exploitation and manipulation) is what they are good at.  The productive class is good only at being productive.  So, generally speaking, we&#39;re screwed.  But I think that maybe we could try a strike.  The politicians really are dependant on us.  They won&#39;t admit it, of course, but they are.  It worked against the Soviet Union and it might work here too.  </p>
<p>P.S. Government isn&#39;t the answer, its the problem.  Government is just a gathering place for those who exploit and manipulate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ecommunist</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69448</link>
		<dc:creator>Ecommunist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69448</guid>
		<description>We are stupid and weak.  They are smart and strong.  I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s right, just the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are stupid and weak.  They are smart and strong.  I&#39;m not saying it&#39;s right, just the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandre</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69439</link>
		<dc:creator>sandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69439</guid>
		<description>Separation of money and state is theoretically easy to achieve. Eliminate Federal reserve and IRS, eliminate all regulation on commerce. It is the practical part that is difficult. Politicians don&#039;t want to separate themselves from money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separation of money and state is theoretically easy to achieve. Eliminate Federal reserve and IRS, eliminate all regulation on commerce. It is the practical part that is difficult. Politicians don&#39;t want to separate themselves from money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoscoH</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69436</link>
		<dc:creator>BoscoH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69436</guid>
		<description>Consequence, preferably driven by reality than the whims of men in power, is a better check on excess. The only downside risk faced by the Wall Streeters who did this was if the United States collapsed. Short of collapse, we would have to bail some portion of them out if the problem got bad enough because the risk of not doing so would be convincing enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem with your statement that government is the only check is that it wasn&#039;t. That has nothing to do with Bush II being in power and not Obama or Clinton. It has nothing to do with innovative financial practices which weren&#039;t sound. The regulatory agencies in place never had the expertise or processes to evaluate them and they can&#039;t. Nor do they have the power to shape incentive like a Barney Frank has. It&#039;s simply an information problem. Read your Hayek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consequence, preferably driven by reality than the whims of men in power, is a better check on excess. The only downside risk faced by the Wall Streeters who did this was if the United States collapsed. Short of collapse, we would have to bail some portion of them out if the problem got bad enough because the risk of not doing so would be convincing enough.</p>
<p>The problem with your statement that government is the only check is that it wasn&#39;t. That has nothing to do with Bush II being in power and not Obama or Clinton. It has nothing to do with innovative financial practices which weren&#39;t sound. The regulatory agencies in place never had the expertise or processes to evaluate them and they can&#39;t. Nor do they have the power to shape incentive like a Barney Frank has. It&#39;s simply an information problem. Read your Hayek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muirgeo</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69430</link>
		<dc:creator>muirgeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69430</guid>
		<description>The game was not set in front of him. He and guys like him wrote the rules and set up the game. The average rational hard working American would push for very different rules. They just aren&#039;t getting the representation people with money can get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The game was not set in front of him. He and guys like him wrote the rules and set up the game. The average rational hard working American would push for very different rules. They just aren&#39;t getting the representation people with money can get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muirgeo</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69422</link>
		<dc:creator>muirgeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69422</guid>
		<description>Hey if you think this money power goes away when you weaken government I think you&#039;ll be in for a big surprise. In fact , weaken government and men with money will make it strong again. They&#039;ll do things like create the Fed for their own purpose. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Government is the only check on these type of people. Not more government but effective government that represents the needs of the people. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fight never changes its always the wealthy elite and powerful against the masses of people simply trying to make a good living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if you think this money power goes away when you weaken government I think you&#39;ll be in for a big surprise. In fact , weaken government and men with money will make it strong again. They&#39;ll do things like create the Fed for their own purpose. </p>
<p>Government is the only check on these type of people. Not more government but effective government that represents the needs of the people. </p>
<p>The fight never changes its always the wealthy elite and powerful against the masses of people simply trying to make a good living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Methinks1776</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69407</link>
		<dc:creator>Methinks1776</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69407</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s an immoral game.  Are you seriously expecting people to refrain from playing the game government sets up?  In this game, you either play or get played.  Most people are too self interested to willingly be on the giving rather than the receiving end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#39;s an immoral game.  Are you seriously expecting people to refrain from playing the game government sets up?  In this game, you either play or get played.  Most people are too self interested to willingly be on the giving rather than the receiving end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69397</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69397</guid>
		<description>This is the end result of government intervention in markets. Sure, there&#039;s a market in the US, but it&#039;s not free. Not even close. The current system only benefits idiots and thieves like Goldman. Having heavily regulated industries, like finance, ends up in only making things worse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I say end the SEC, end the Fed, stop the Treasury from perpetrating the current garbage and bring on the free banking and truly open markets. Markets where, if you fail, no one bails you out-- leaving other people, who acted prudently, will rise up to take your place. The market is supposed to be a profit and loss system. What&#039;s currently in place is a system where the only people that lose are the consumers and taxpayers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert Wenzel from Ecnoomic Policy journal posted an interesting list recently: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;The Latest List of Goldman Player&#039;s Now in (or recently in) Government&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton (Robert Rubin)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Treasury Secretary under George Bush (Hank Paulson)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Current president and former chairman of the New York Federal Reserve (William Dudley and Stephen Friedman)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chief of Staff to current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (Mark Patterson)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chief of Staff under President Bush (Joshua Bolten)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economic adviser to the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton (Robert Hormats)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Gary Gensler)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Under-Secretary of State for Economic, Business, and Agricultural affairs under President Bush (Reuben Jeffery)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The past and current heads of the New York Stock Exchange (John Thain and Duncan Niederauer)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The chief operating officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement division (Adam Storch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Goldman’s new top lobbyist in Washington, Michael Paese, used to work for Barney Frank, the congressman who chairs the House Financial Services Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In London, Goldman&#039;s former chief economist and partner, Gavyn Davies, is married to Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s special adviser Sue Nye. Under Tony Blair, Davies became chairman of the BBC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His successor as chief economist at Goldman, the late David Walton, was handed a seat on the Bank of England’s interest-rate setting Monetary Policy Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Paul Deighton, who is running the London Olympic Games organising committee, used to be Goldman’s chief operating officer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Obama’s top economic adviser Larry Summers never worked directly for Goldman, but served in Clinton’s government under his mentor, Goldmanite Robert Rubin, and Goldman paid Summers $135,000 to appear at a one-day speaking event in 2008 before Barack Obama came to power&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Goldmanite Mark Carney is governor of the Bank of Canada.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Robert Zoellick, head of the World Bank, was a managing director and chairman of the Goldman&#039;s International Advisors department.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Neel Kashkari Treasury Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability, during the Hank Paulson period at Treasury, is a former Goldman Sachs man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ultimate global inside operator is Mario Draghi From 2002 to 2005, he was vice chairman and managing director of Goldman Sachs International and a member of the firm-wide management committee. He is governor of the Bank of Italy. In this capacity, he is a member of the Governing and General Councils of the European Central Bank and a member of the Board of Directors of the Bank for International Settlements.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He is also governor for Italy on the Boards of Governors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Asian Development Bank. In April 2006 he was elected Chairman of the very powerful Financial Stability Forum, which became Financial Stability Board in spring 2009.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the end result of government intervention in markets. Sure, there&#39;s a market in the US, but it&#39;s not free. Not even close. The current system only benefits idiots and thieves like Goldman. Having heavily regulated industries, like finance, ends up in only making things worse.</p>
<p>I say end the SEC, end the Fed, stop the Treasury from perpetrating the current garbage and bring on the free banking and truly open markets. Markets where, if you fail, no one bails you out&#8211; leaving other people, who acted prudently, will rise up to take your place. The market is supposed to be a profit and loss system. What&#39;s currently in place is a system where the only people that lose are the consumers and taxpayers.</p>
<p>Robert Wenzel from Ecnoomic Policy journal posted an interesting list recently: </p>
<p>&#8220;The Latest List of Goldman Player&#39;s Now in (or recently in) Government</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton (Robert Rubin)</p>
<p>Treasury Secretary under George Bush (Hank Paulson)</p>
<p>Current president and former chairman of the New York Federal Reserve (William Dudley and Stephen Friedman)</p>
<p>Chief of Staff to current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner (Mark Patterson)</p>
<p>Chief of Staff under President Bush (Joshua Bolten)</p>
<p>Economic adviser to the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton (Robert Hormats)</p>
<p>Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Gary Gensler)</p>
<p>Under-Secretary of State for Economic, Business, and Agricultural affairs under President Bush (Reuben Jeffery)</p>
<p>The past and current heads of the New York Stock Exchange (John Thain and Duncan Niederauer)</p>
<p>The chief operating officer of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s enforcement division (Adam Storch)</p>
<p>Goldman’s new top lobbyist in Washington, Michael Paese, used to work for Barney Frank, the congressman who chairs the House Financial Services Committee.</p>
<p>In London, Goldman&#39;s former chief economist and partner, Gavyn Davies, is married to Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s special adviser Sue Nye. Under Tony Blair, Davies became chairman of the BBC.</p>
<p>His successor as chief economist at Goldman, the late David Walton, was handed a seat on the Bank of England’s interest-rate setting Monetary Policy Committee.</p>
<p>Paul Deighton, who is running the London Olympic Games organising committee, used to be Goldman’s chief operating officer.</p>
<p>Obama’s top economic adviser Larry Summers never worked directly for Goldman, but served in Clinton’s government under his mentor, Goldmanite Robert Rubin, and Goldman paid Summers $135,000 to appear at a one-day speaking event in 2008 before Barack Obama came to power</p>
<p>Goldmanite Mark Carney is governor of the Bank of Canada.</p>
<p>Robert Zoellick, head of the World Bank, was a managing director and chairman of the Goldman&#39;s International Advisors department.</p>
<p>Neel Kashkari Treasury Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability, during the Hank Paulson period at Treasury, is a former Goldman Sachs man.</p>
<p>The ultimate global inside operator is Mario Draghi From 2002 to 2005, he was vice chairman and managing director of Goldman Sachs International and a member of the firm-wide management committee. He is governor of the Bank of Italy. In this capacity, he is a member of the Governing and General Councils of the European Central Bank and a member of the Board of Directors of the Bank for International Settlements.</p>
<p>He is also governor for Italy on the Boards of Governors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Asian Development Bank. In April 2006 he was elected Chairman of the very powerful Financial Stability Forum, which became Financial Stability Board in spring 2009.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveO</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69395</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69395</guid>
		<description>Russ, as much asI respect your opinion, I&#039;ve been thinking for some time now that you may actually be too forgiving to your opponents, too open minded, too willing to be patient and non-judgmental. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone breaks into my house while I&#039;m baking brownies and forces me to put a teeny-tiny bit of poop in the brownies, is it fair to say &quot;the brownie system&quot; is the problem? No. It is the mix of systems that is the problem. The poop would actually do some good in another context- just as there as very specific, very limited, proper functions for government. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My challenge to the government apologists is this; try a mental experiment where we get to have all the capitalism in one part of the country, and you get to keep all the government. We would have to do without the protections of basic government functions- we&#039;d make due with our best approximations. You would have to do without the productive capital and PPE- getting by with your best approximations. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t see how anyone sane thinks the all government side of the fence would last very long. Inherently, government can&#039;t survive without something to leech off of. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, radical idea: Try a capitalist system with the limited functions of government ensuring individual rights by punishing initiation of violence, and enforcing contracts, with only the leeching minimally required to do so. Win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, as much asI respect your opinion, I&#39;ve been thinking for some time now that you may actually be too forgiving to your opponents, too open minded, too willing to be patient and non-judgmental. </p>
<p>If someone breaks into my house while I&#39;m baking brownies and forces me to put a teeny-tiny bit of poop in the brownies, is it fair to say &#8220;the brownie system&#8221; is the problem? No. It is the mix of systems that is the problem. The poop would actually do some good in another context- just as there as very specific, very limited, proper functions for government. </p>
<p>My challenge to the government apologists is this; try a mental experiment where we get to have all the capitalism in one part of the country, and you get to keep all the government. We would have to do without the protections of basic government functions- we&#39;d make due with our best approximations. You would have to do without the productive capital and PPE- getting by with your best approximations. </p>
<p>I don&#39;t see how anyone sane thinks the all government side of the fence would last very long. Inherently, government can&#39;t survive without something to leech off of. </p>
<p>Now, radical idea: Try a capitalist system with the limited functions of government ensuring individual rights by punishing initiation of violence, and enforcing contracts, with only the leeching minimally required to do so. Win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russroberts</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69393</link>
		<dc:creator>russroberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69393</guid>
		<description>But it&#039;s an immoral game. Yes, I understand his incentive. But it&#039;s still repulsive and wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it&#39;s an immoral game. Yes, I understand his incentive. But it&#39;s still repulsive and wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG Lesvic</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69391</link>
		<dc:creator>DG Lesvic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69391</guid>
		<description>No better summation of the whole thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No better summation of the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoscoH</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/looter.html/comment-page-1#comment-69384</link>
		<dc:creator>BoscoH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7203#comment-69384</guid>
		<description>To paraphrase George a little out of context: &quot;The problem is... the government...&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Exactly. Russ&#039; conclusion is a powerful one because it can be read by the less careful reader as an endorsement of the kinds of things George likes: regulation, government intervention, etc. But a closer look shows that Russ recognizes that when there is a concentration of power and wealth like government that does not have to be responsible to the truths dictated by the market except in the very long term &quot;life of a nation&quot; sense, the lure of power and basically free money draws a lot of looters in like fireflies to streetlight.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It should be no surprise that Wall Street&#039;s best friends are politicians like Barney Frank, who on the surface seem obviously unfriendly to their interests, but in actuality, provide very inexpensive cover for the looting. Play our way, lend to our constituencies, and when things go bad, we&#039;ll put up the money to bail you out. Not just your firms, but your lavish bonuses too. And we can even make it look like punishment. Skip those 7 figure bonuses for a couple of years or cut them in half -- they&#039;ll be there when this washes over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase George a little out of context: &#8220;The problem is&#8230; the government&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. Russ&#39; conclusion is a powerful one because it can be read by the less careful reader as an endorsement of the kinds of things George likes: regulation, government intervention, etc. But a closer look shows that Russ recognizes that when there is a concentration of power and wealth like government that does not have to be responsible to the truths dictated by the market except in the very long term &#8220;life of a nation&#8221; sense, the lure of power and basically free money draws a lot of looters in like fireflies to streetlight.</p>
<p>It should be no surprise that Wall Street&#39;s best friends are politicians like Barney Frank, who on the surface seem obviously unfriendly to their interests, but in actuality, provide very inexpensive cover for the looting. Play our way, lend to our constituencies, and when things go bad, we&#39;ll put up the money to bail you out. Not just your firms, but your lavish bonuses too. And we can even make it look like punishment. Skip those 7 figure bonuses for a couple of years or cut them in half &#8212; they&#39;ll be there when this washes over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
