Comments on: Menacing Krugman http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html/comment-page-1#comment-191541 Anonymous Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:39:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7345#comment-191541 Hmm... most of his NYT blog audience? Here's an amusing example from the China article that Don posted: "Are you and Joseph Stiglitz invited to participate in the White House Jobs Summit? YOU BOTH DEFINITELY SHOULD BE! I am ready to march in the streets if you are not. I asked Mr. Douthat to see what he could do about making sure that you will be there! After all, the Republicans might as well be helpful about something!" Hmm… most of his NYT blog audience?

Here’s an amusing example from the China article that Don posted:
“Are you and Joseph Stiglitz invited to participate in the White House Jobs Summit? YOU BOTH DEFINITELY SHOULD BE! I am ready to march in the streets if you are not. I asked Mr. Douthat to see what he could do about making sure that you will be there! After all, the Republicans might as well be helpful about something!”

]]> By: Curious http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html/comment-page-1#comment-191522 Curious Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:52:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7345#comment-191522 Agreed. Government employees are worse than unemployed because: 1. they cost more 2. their "work" makes life harder for the real wealth creators (private sector) So every government employee should be counted as more than 1 person on welfare and thus unemployment today is much, much worse than during the Great Depression. Agreed. Government employees are worse than unemployed because:
1. they cost more
2. their “work” makes life harder for the real wealth creators (private sector)

So every government employee should be counted as more than 1 person on welfare and thus unemployment today is much, much worse than during the Great Depression.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html/comment-page-1#comment-191488 Anonymous Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:39:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7345#comment-191488 Don, not to be a suck-up or anything, but I enjoy your constant assault on Krugman. He's got a nice fat pedestal from which he can assault us (and the progressives who listen), so don't change a thing. Don, not to be a suck-up or anything, but I enjoy your constant assault on Krugman. He’s got a nice fat pedestal from which he can assault us (and the progressives who listen), so don’t change a thing.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html/comment-page-1#comment-191487 Anonymous Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:31:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7345#comment-191487 As any honest dissenter will tell you, the berating of misguided men with ginormous public pedestals is never tiresome. As any honest dissenter will tell you, the berating of misguided men with ginormous public pedestals is never tiresome.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/menacing-krugman.html/comment-page-1#comment-191459 Anonymous Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7345#comment-191459 His economics predicted this market collapse as libertarians cheered it on. His economics predicted this market collapse as libertarians cheered it on.

]]>