Comments on: The Will to Think Unclouded by Romantic Foolishiness http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html where orders emerge Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Sam Grove http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html/comment-page-1#comment-190313 Sam Grove Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:01:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7188#comment-190313 Well George, You've proved one thing by this; your personal integrity means so little to you that you practically brag about perpetrating a fraud by signing on to a statement with which you disagree. What am I to assume now, that the other signers also have the same lack of integrity? I agree with the statement, yet I never thought to sign on to it as I don't consider my name an asset to the petition. If I ever disagreed with a petition statement such as this, I would never think to fraudulently sign on to it in an effort to undermine its credibility. Whose credibility has been undermined by your actions? Well George,
You’ve proved one thing by this; your personal integrity means so little to you that you practically brag about perpetrating a fraud by signing on to a statement with which you disagree.

What am I to assume now, that the other signers also have the same lack of integrity?

I agree with the statement, yet I never thought to sign on to it as I don’t consider my name an asset to the petition.

If I ever disagreed with a petition statement such as this, I would never think to fraudulently sign on to it in an effort to undermine its credibility.

Whose credibility has been undermined by your actions?

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html/comment-page-1#comment-190001 Anonymous Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:32:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7188#comment-190001 Yes this is true. There was a day in 1957, April 10th to be exact that I wanted to last forever. Damn the bad .........whatever. Yes this is true. There was a day in 1957, April 10th to be exact that I wanted to last forever.

Damn the bad ………whatever.

]]> By: Sam Grove http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html/comment-page-1#comment-189968 Sam Grove Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:42:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7188#comment-189968 Weasling words. Nobody disputes "climate change". That's what AGW doomsayers came up with to cover their butts of events don't match their forecasts. Change is a known characteristic of planetary climate and I am not aware of anyone who suggests that climate is static, but apparently AGW doomsayers think it should be. Weasling words. Nobody disputes “climate change”.

That’s what AGW doomsayers came up with to cover their butts of events don’t match their forecasts.

Change is a known characteristic of planetary climate and I am not aware of anyone who suggests that climate is static, but apparently AGW doomsayers think it should be.

]]> By: Anonymous http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html/comment-page-1#comment-189966 Anonymous Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:33:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7188#comment-189966 It has to be something stupid like that - I just have no use for politicizing science, it's never been a good idea, but that's what these AGW alarmists do constantly. It has to be something stupid like that – I just have no use for politicizing science, it’s never been a good idea, but that’s what these AGW alarmists do constantly.

]]> By: Sam Grove http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/the-will-to-think-unclouded-by-romantic-foolishiness.html/comment-page-1#comment-189881 Sam Grove Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:41:00 +0000 http://cafehayek.com/?p=7188#comment-189881 I think it safe to assume that human activity impacts climate. I think it erroneous to assume that the impact is a net negative. And I think it unwise to proclaim any certainty on the net contribution of AG emissions to climate trends. I think it safe to assume that human activity impacts climate.

I think it erroneous to assume that the impact is a net negative.

And I think it unwise to proclaim any certainty on the net contribution of AG emissions to climate trends.

]]>