<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unemployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/comment-page-1#comment-189515</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7160#comment-189515</guid>
		<description>The only squirminess is in Yasafi&#039;s brain (and yours by proxy, if you agree with his assessment). 

I may be the only registered Republican who is a regular at this Cafe, and about the only policies of Bush&#039;s that I&#039;ve defended were income tax &lt;B&gt;rate&lt;/B&gt; cuts, and on the necessity of combating Islamo-fascism. Other than those two policies, GW Bush was much more in line with Lyndon Johnson than with Ronald Reagan. 

Yasafi only sees party affiliation. Yasafi sees the president as a King. Had Joe Lieberman been president for the past eight years, we&#039;d have had virtually the same domestic and foreign policy, and Yasafi would be blaming the current recession on GHW Bush. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only squirminess is in Yasafi&#8217;s brain (and yours by proxy, if you agree with his assessment). </p>
<p>I may be the only registered Republican who is a regular at this Cafe, and about the only policies of Bush&#8217;s that I&#8217;ve defended were income tax <b>rate</b> cuts, and on the necessity of combating Islamo-fascism. Other than those two policies, GW Bush was much more in line with Lyndon Johnson than with Ronald Reagan. </p>
<p>Yasafi only sees party affiliation. Yasafi sees the president as a King. Had Joe Lieberman been president for the past eight years, we&#8217;d have had virtually the same domestic and foreign policy, and Yasafi would be blaming the current recession on GHW Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/comment-page-1#comment-189476</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7160#comment-189476</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s uncertainty about the Democrats and the deficits (which everyone still seems perfectly happy to finance) that&#039;s spooking business.  It couldn&#039;t possibly be the recession.

I know this is going to blow your mind... but a lot of the business community recognizes that deficit spending is necessary for macroeconomic stabilization right now.  The business community isn&#039;t Austrian and it isn&#039;t libertarian.

I&#039;m curious how you got to that 2% figure.  It&#039;s surprisingly precise for such an abstract concern.

*And a note to anyone that wants to make that statement black and white or absolutist - OF COURSE I know there are some skeptics of the stimulus plan and the administration in the business community.  I usually don&#039;t append that because IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s uncertainty about the Democrats and the deficits (which everyone still seems perfectly happy to finance) that&#8217;s spooking business.  It couldn&#8217;t possibly be the recession.</p>
<p>I know this is going to blow your mind&#8230; but a lot of the business community recognizes that deficit spending is necessary for macroeconomic stabilization right now.  The business community isn&#8217;t Austrian and it isn&#8217;t libertarian.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious how you got to that 2% figure.  It&#8217;s surprisingly precise for such an abstract concern.</p>
<p>*And a note to anyone that wants to make that statement black and white or absolutist &#8211; OF COURSE I know there are some skeptics of the stimulus plan and the administration in the business community.  I usually don&#8217;t append that because IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/comment-page-1#comment-189475</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7160#comment-189475</guid>
		<description>Nothing? I voted for a Republican on Tuesday, so I&#039;d hate for him to stumble on this blog and actually find out that I demonize him... so if you&#039;ve discovered where I demonize Republicans, please let us know so I can address it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing? I voted for a Republican on Tuesday, so I&#8217;d hate for him to stumble on this blog and actually find out that I demonize him&#8230; so if you&#8217;ve discovered where I demonize Republicans, please let us know so I can address it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/comment-page-1#comment-189473</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7160#comment-189473</guid>
		<description>And what I don&#039;t understand is that that ideology and squirminess of reality isn&#039;t even necessary for a respectable libertarianism.  I&#039;m not sure why they do it.  Maybe because they&#039;ve committed and they feel like they can&#039;t back out now?  I don&#039;t know.

And I should say to you, muirgeo, that talking as if Republicans are economic poison is ridiculous as well.  Just something to keep in mind.  Some Republicans can be just like some Democrats can be, but there&#039;s nothing about the party that is inherently dangerous for the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what I don&#8217;t understand is that that ideology and squirminess of reality isn&#8217;t even necessary for a respectable libertarianism.  I&#8217;m not sure why they do it.  Maybe because they&#8217;ve committed and they feel like they can&#8217;t back out now?  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>And I should say to you, muirgeo, that talking as if Republicans are economic poison is ridiculous as well.  Just something to keep in mind.  Some Republicans can be just like some Democrats can be, but there&#8217;s nothing about the party that is inherently dangerous for the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2009/11/unemployment.html/comment-page-1#comment-189455</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=7160#comment-189455</guid>
		<description>That 2 percentage points was data obtained objectively using his trade marked  Unemployometer. It&#039;s accurate to with in 0.00000001%. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 2 percentage points was data obtained objectively using his trade marked  Unemployometer. It&#8217;s accurate to with in 0.00000001%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

