<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Other people&#8217;s money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cafehayek.com/2010/03/other-peoples-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cafehayek.com/2010/03/other-peoples-money.html</link>
	<description>where orders emerge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 02:06:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://cafehayek.com/2010/03/other-peoples-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-89596</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cafehayek.com/?p=8923#comment-89596</guid>
		<description>@rayllove comment #27:

Well, I counted 81 words and 6 commas in your first sentence, so the chances are pretty high that I might be misunderstanding you. I&#039;ve attempted to unravel what you mean, so I&#039;ll give it a shot.

It *seems* like you are saying the following:

1) There are no countries which demonstrate that &quot;European Socialism&quot; is inferior to Capitalism.

2) There are many countries that demonstrate &quot;European Socialism&quot; is superior to some standard (Capitalism?).

3) There are no countries that demonstrate Capitalism to be superior to &quot;European Socialism&quot;.

Am I accurately describing your points? If not, would you mind re-phrasing your argument in shorter, simpler sentences? I really need some clarity as to what your actual claims are. I&#039;ll go ahead and ignore the rest of your comments because they seem more like ad hominem attacks than anything else and I personally find that to be non-productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rayllove comment #27:</p>
<p>Well, I counted 81 words and 6 commas in your first sentence, so the chances are pretty high that I might be misunderstanding you. I&#8217;ve attempted to unravel what you mean, so I&#8217;ll give it a shot.</p>
<p>It *seems* like you are saying the following:</p>
<p>1) There are no countries which demonstrate that &#8220;European Socialism&#8221; is inferior to Capitalism.</p>
<p>2) There are many countries that demonstrate &#8220;European Socialism&#8221; is superior to some standard (Capitalism?).</p>
<p>3) There are no countries that demonstrate Capitalism to be superior to &#8220;European Socialism&#8221;.</p>
<p>Am I accurately describing your points? If not, would you mind re-phrasing your argument in shorter, simpler sentences? I really need some clarity as to what your actual claims are. I&#8217;ll go ahead and ignore the rest of your comments because they seem more like ad hominem attacks than anything else and I personally find that to be non-productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

