Tweet [1]
Here’s a letter to the Washington Post:
Robert Samuelson rightly ridicules those who allege that speculators, in Pres. Obama’s words, “artificially manipulate markets” (“The fallacy of blaming oil ‘speculators’ [2],” May 3).
It’s child’s play to show that Mr. Obama’s allegation is economically confused. But Mr. Obama is no economist. He’s a politician seeking office. And so he blames rising prices on imaginary devils – against whom he can rant, rave, and pretend to take corrective action – rather than recognize that such price hikes are merely the result of disagreeable underlying economic realities that he either cannot or will not correct.
Predictably, Mr. Obama is here practicing a long-honored – and scarily often bloodthirsty – political tradition. It’s a tradition honored by communist butchers such as Vladimir Lenin (“For as long as we fail to treat speculators the way they deserve – with a bullet in the head – we will not get anywhere at all”) and by American icons such as Abraham Lincoln (“For my part, I wish every one of them [speculators] had his devilish head shot off”).*
Economic ignorance and blame-shifting by politicians knows no ideological boundaries.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Professor of Economics
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA 22030* Quoted on page 343 of David S. Jacks, “Populists versus theorists: Futures markets and the volatility of prices [3],” Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 44, (2007), pp. 342-362. (The Lincoln quotation also appears on page 502 of David Herbert Donald’s 1996 biography, Lincoln [4].)
(HT to Methinks for alerting me to Jacks’s paper.)
Politicians will forever furiously itch to silence the free speech that is price movements [5] – to kill messengers that bring unwelcome or politically troublesome news.