Tim Worstall on Measuring Labor’s (and Labour’s) Share of National Income
Posted By Don Boudreaux On September 29, 2012 @ 4:50 pm In Data | Comments Disabled
The always-insightful Tim Worstall sent to me these two links – here [1] and here [2] – after reading my ruminations [3] on the measured trend of labor’s ‘share’ of national income. Although “geektastic” (to use Tim’s illuminating descriptor), each of these two Forbes essays by Tim is well worth careful attention.
Comments
Article printed from Cafe Hayek: http://cafehayek.com
URL to article: http://cafehayek.com/2012/09/tim-worstall-on-measuring-labors-and-labours-share-of-national-income.html
URLs in this post:
[1] here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/09/26/labours-share-of-the-national-income-is-falling-but-is-it-being-measured-the-right-way/
[2] here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/09/11/trades-union-congress-misleads-with-statistics-on-wages/
[3] my ruminations: http://cafehayek.com/2012/09/wages-productivity-rates-of-return-and-investment-quick-thoughts.html
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8] Image: http://www.blinklist.com/index.php?Action=Blink/addblink.php&Url=http%3A%2F%2Fcafehayek.com%2F2012%2F09%2Ftim-worstall-on-measuring-labors-and-labours-share-of-national-income.html&Title=Tim%20Worstall%20on%20Measuring%20Labor%27s%20%28and%20Labour%27s%29%20Share%20of%20National%20Income
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13] Tweet: https://twitter.com/share
Click here to print.