- Cafe Hayek - http://cafehayek.com -
Shiller on whether economics is a science
Posted By Russ Roberts On November 6, 2013 @ 1:01 pm In Complexity & Emergence,Science,Scientism | Comments Disabled
One problem with economics is that it is necessarily focused on policy, rather than discovery of fundamentals. Nobody really cares much about economic data except as a guide to policy: economic phenomena do not have the same intrinsic fascination for us as the internal resonances of the atom or the functioning of the vesicles and other organelles of a living cell. We judge economics by what it can produce. As such, economics is rather more like engineering than physics, more practical than spiritual.
I don’t agree with any of that. And I don’t think Adam Smith or F. A. Hayek (or my co-host, Don) would either. I think understanding how prices emerge to steer resources without anyone being in charge to be intrinsically fascinating and even spiritual.
Article printed from Cafe Hayek: http://cafehayek.com
URL to article: http://cafehayek.com/2013/11/shiller-on-whether-economics-is-a-science.html
URLs in this post:
 His answer is: http://www.theguardian.com/business/economics-blog/2013/nov/06/is-economics-a-science-robert-shiller
 Robert Went: https://twitter.com/went1955
 Image: http://www.blinklist.com/index.php?Action=Blink/addblink.php&Url=http%3A%2F%2Fcafehayek.com%2F2013%2F11%2Fshiller-on-whether-economics-is-a-science.html&Title=Shiller%20on%20whether%20economics%20is%20a%20science
 Tweet: https://twitter.com/share
Copyright © 2011 CafeHayek.com. All rights reserved.