- Cafe Hayek - https://cafehayek.com -

Some Links

Tweet [1]

Cato’s Michael Cannon is justifiably proud that some folks over at the New Republic are unhappy with his steadfast opposition to Obamacare [2].

John Goodman reminds us of this superb brief essay by David Henderson, from 2006, on the damage done by minimum-wage legislation [3].

And although it’s nearly 19 years old – but not quite as old as the 1994 American Economic Review article by David Card and Alan Krueger [4]this paper by Richard Vedder and Lowell Gallaway on the damage done by minimum-wage legislation is also worth reading [5].

Continuing on with explanations of the damage done by minimum-wage legislation, here’s a short essay by Pamela Villarreal [6].

Andrew Biggs discusses the New York Times’s illogic on minimum-wage legislation [7].  A slice:

For instance, look at the fast food industry, which employs a lot of lower-skilled, lower-paid employees. Since 1987, output per hour in all non-farm businesses has risen by around 71%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, an annual rate of 2.19%. The Times’ logic says wages in the fast food industry should have risen by a like amount. But BLS data show that productivity at self-serve restaurants has risen only by 0.45% annually since 1987, for total growth of 12%.

The simple fact is that if fast food restaurants increased wages by 71% over a period in which their own labor productivity rose by only 12%, they’d be out of business. Ask yourself: do shuttered businesses pay higher wages than firms that remain in business? If not, you might want to think twice about that $15 minimum wage.

And now for the damage done by minimum-wage legislation combined with Obamacare, check out this essay in yesterday’s Investor’s Business Daily [8].  (HT W.E. Heasley)  Its headline says it all:

$10 Minimum Wage + ObamaCare = 70% Labor Cost Hike

Walter Grinder points us to this essay by Jim Powell on Algernon Sidney [9].

Sarah Skwire is always a joy to read [10].

Share [11] Tweet [12] Share [13] Email [14] Print [15]

Comments