Tweet [1]
Here’s a letter that I sent yesterday to the Washington Post:
Using a big floppy roller to paint a fine portrait creates only a mess as unintelligible as it is ugly. And so it is with Harold Meyerson’s attempt to portray modern market-oriented economics (“Economists for an Imaginary World [2],” Sept. 30).
For example, Mr. Meyerson’s suggestion that free-market economics relies uniquely and especially heavily upon elegant mathematics is flat-out wrong. Perhaps the greatest champion of the mathematical modeling of economic relationships is Paul Samuelson [3], who is no one’s idea of a free-marketeer. And perhaps the greatest free-market economist of the 20th century, F.A. Hayek [4], not only used almost no math in his own work, but he also literally wrote a book – The Counter-Revolution of Science [5] (1952) – to warn economists of the severe limits of mathematics as a language for learning about, and discussing, a phenomenon as complex as a modern human economy.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux