- Cafe Hayek - https://cafehayek.com -

Some Links

Tweet [1]

Mark Pennington corrects appalling mischaracterizations of the work of the late, great Elinor Ostrom [2].

So, is post-Mao economic growth in China the result of Beijing’s continuing interventions or of its pulling back from intervening as heavily as it once did?  Paul Gregory says the latter [3].

I just learned of this 2009 paper by the late, great Larry Ribstein entitled “Wall Street and Vine: Hollywood’s View of Business.” [4]  I haven’t yet read it, but, being written by Larry, it’s bound to be worthwhile.

In this short video, Steve Horwitz answers the question: Is Capitalism Pro-Business? [5]

Arnold Kling explains his Austro-Keynesianism [6].

Sandy Ikeda discusses the often-overlooked importance of the division of labor for economic growth [7].

Steve Landsburg links to some videos of talks given at the Summer 2012 Cato University [8].

Share [9] Tweet [10] Share [11] Email [12] Print [13]

Comments