Tweet [1]
Mark Pennington corrects appalling mischaracterizations of the work of the late, great Elinor Ostrom [2].
So, is post-Mao economic growth in China the result of Beijing’s continuing interventions or of its pulling back from intervening as heavily as it once did? Paul Gregory says the latter [3].
I just learned of this 2009 paper by the late, great Larry Ribstein entitled “Wall Street and Vine: Hollywood’s View of Business.” [4] I haven’t yet read it, but, being written by Larry, it’s bound to be worthwhile.
In this short video, Steve Horwitz answers the question: Is Capitalism Pro-Business? [5]
Arnold Kling explains his Austro-Keynesianism [6].
Sandy Ikeda discusses the often-overlooked importance of the division of labor for economic growth [7].
Steve Landsburg links to some videos of talks given at the Summer 2012 Cato University [8].