Here’s a letter that I sent today to the New York Post:
The Editor, New York Post
Dear Editor:
As
you report, Uncle Sam "blames Beijing’s currency practices for
contributing to the United States’ bloated trade deficit with China"
("IMF Chief: Global Economy Threats Easing," Jan. 16). But as my
colleague Tyler Cowen explained in his New York Times column, a higher
valued Chinese yuan would have little, if any, effect on the size of
this trade deficit.The reason is that Chinese manufacturers
specialize in assembly: they buy component parts from other Asian
countries and then assemble these parts into finished products for
export.By lowering Chinese producers’ costs of acquiring key
inputs, a higher-valued yuan would reduce their costs of production -
and thus do little to raise the prices that American consumers pay for
goods made in China.Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Chairman, Department of Economics
George Mason University
Share
{ 3 comments }
Good point — although surely the price would change to some degree? I suppose you've studied it thoroughly and discovered that it will balance.
But why is China keeping its yuan value low, then?
It may be the other side of the equation – keeping a lid on imports for Chinese internal consumption.
I would just say one thing to you and that is, “FANTASTIC”!! Keep it up and wish to get more details from your blog.
regards
sears parts