Mark Pennington corrects appalling mischaracterizations of the work of the late, great Elinor Ostrom.

So, is post-Mao economic growth in China the result of Beijing’s continuing interventions or of its pulling back from intervening as heavily as it once did?  Paul Gregory says the latter.

I just learned of this 2009 paper by the late, great Larry Ribstein entitled “Wall Street and Vine: Hollywood’s View of Business.”  I haven’t yet read it, but, being written by Larry, it’s bound to be worthwhile.

In this short video, Steve Horwitz answers the question: Is Capitalism Pro-Business?

Arnold Kling explains his Austro-Keynesianism.

Sandy Ikeda discusses the often-overlooked importance of the division of labor for economic growth.

Steve Landsburg links to some videos of talks given at the Summer 2012 Cato University.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments

comments

Add a Comment    Share Share    Print    Email

Previous post:

Next post: