≡ Menu

Some Links

Ramesh Ponnuru details some of the costly history of the sort of trade policies championed by Donald Trump.  A slice:

Unintended harm to American companies is a recurring problem with tariffs, even those meant to protect American jobs from competition that our government deems unfair. After Bush imposed steel tariffs, steel-consuming industries pointed out that they employed far more Americans than the steel industry itself, and argued that the net effect of the policy on jobs was negative.

Anti-dumping laws, which put tariffs on foreign imports that are supposedly being sold at too low a price, usually target intermediate goods and therefore make the downstream American producers that use them less competitive. Daniel Ikenson, a trade-policy analyst at the Cato Institute, notes that the government, perversely, is forbidden by law from considering the impact of tariffs on these producers before levying the tariffs.

The Wall Street Journal‘s editors are unimpressed by Trump’s recent trade screed.  A slice:

Nafta has also helped U.S. industry stay globally competitive. Many companies have moved plants to Mexico, but they often supply parts for U.S. finished goods. An April 2015 Congressional Research Service study credits Nafta “with helping U.S. manufacturing industries, especially the U.S. auto industry, become more globally competitive through the development of supply chains.” By moving some low-wage jobs to Mexico, car makers have been able to maintain U.S. production.

K. William Watson reveals the depressing similarities between Trump’s trade proposals and those of the Democrats.

The Cato Institute’s trade scholars endorse TPP, finding – plausibly – that its potential benefits outweigh its flaws.

Doug Bandow has warm if not resounding applause for Brexit.

Douglas French helpfully slays the perennial myth that government stands ready to be made more socially responsible by being better managed – as in, managed more like a business.

My Mercatus Center colleague Veronique de Rugy is rightly displeased with the fishiness of cronyism.