≡ Menu

Some Links

Over at the Law & Liberty blog, Northwestern University law professor John McGinnis warns that “Progressivism” by its nature is a threat to the rule of law.  (HT Brian Mannix)  A slice:

Many people are concerned about Donald Trump’s commitment to the rule of law, a concern I share. But the other choice in this election is a Progressive one, and Progressivism by its nature lacks that commitment. Moreover, its history shows that it permanently damages the constitutional foundations of the United States. And the United States suffers from the fevers of progressivism more than any time since the 1960s.  Thus, this election pits a candidate lawless by virtue of temperament against one lawless by virtue of ideology and emboldened by the spirit of the times.  The rule of law is under threat, whoever wins.

Progressivism has proved a greater long-term danger than any single individual, because it is born in part out of systematic rather than personal hostility to the Constitution. Federalism and separation of powers are obstacles to the social engineering at the heart of progressivism, and thus progressivism has tried to eviscerate these restraints. Packed with FDR appointees in the 1930s, the Supreme Court gutted the enumerated powers. The administrative state has eroded the separation of powers, making the executive ever more powerful in domestic affairs. The theory used to justify these departures from the original constitution, living constitutionalism, is itself a threat to the rule of law, because it devalues the formal rules laid down by the Constitution.

Speaking of the hubris, scientism, and disregard for individual rights that are hallmarks of “Progressivism,” Phil Magness reports on John Maynard Keynes’s ugly, illiberal record on this front.

And speaking of Keynes – who bequeathed to us bushels of unhealthy scientistic fruits, not the least of which is naive theorizing about aggregates – here’s Arnold Kling setting Barry Eichengreen straight about the case for trade.

Steve Chapman rightly exposes Mike Pence’s insufferable hypocrisy.

Jared Meyer asks if Uber drivers lose money.

Richard Ebeling reflects on Clinton and Trump in plunderland.

I hope that my former student Alex Nowrasteh is correct that the American public is becoming more open to immigration.