≡ Menu

A Protectionist is Someone Who…

… thinks that the ultimate purpose of producing goods and services is to use them to acquire as much money as possible.  Unlike a free-trader who understands that the purpose of producing goods and services is to acquire for yourself and your family as many as possible real goods and services to raise as much as possible your standard of living – and who understands that exchanging for money what you directly produce is merely a means of lowering your cost of acquiring in exchange as many as possible goods and services produced by others – the protectionist thinks that the ultimate purpose of producing real goods and services is to use them to acquire as much money as possible.

The Econ 101 teacher typically draws on the white board a diagram of two countries trading with each other.  Country A is shown exporting (say) steel to country B in exchange for dollars, and then using those dollars to buy lumber from country B.  The Econ 101 teacher informs his or her class that, while these exchanges are mediated by dollars, what ultimately is going on in this diagram is that the people of country A produce steel and send some of that steel to the people of country B because the people of country A want lumber from country B.  Likewise, the people of country B produce lumber and send some of it to the people of country A because the people of country B want steel from country A.  “The money that you see, class,” explains the Econ 101 teacher, “merely facilitates the exchange of steel for lumber. What’s important here is the getting of steel and of lumber.  Money is a tool used by the people of country A to transform some of the steel they produce into lumber that they want to consume.  Likewise, money is a tool used by the people of country B to transform some of the lumber they produce into steel that they want to consume.”

The protectionist thinks of this hypothetical two-country exchange entirely differently from the way that the Econ 101 teacher thinks of it.  For the protectionist, the people of country A produce steel as a means of getting money; that is the ultimate goal.  And the people of country B produce lumber as a means of getting money; that – the getting of money – is the ultimate goal.  While for the Econ 101 teacher the two-country diagram that he or she draws is meant to show how money facilitates the ultimate acquisition by the peoples of each country of real goods, for the protectionist the diagram seems to show that the production of real goods is a means of facilitating the ultimate acquisition by the peoples of each country of money.

Comments