≡ Menu

Some Covid Links

Sherelle Jacobs warns of the risk of “a sinister new bio-surveillance state.” A slice:

The Cummings consensus [in favor of hard and fast lockdowns] is not simply factually spurious but potentially dangerous. The establishment of “fast, hard” lockdowns as the policy gold standard could spell stay-at-home orders every time there is a variant scare. So, too, the institutionalisation of fallible modellers as a new breed of philosopher kings, thanks to the precautionary principle.

The unconditional acceptance of lockdowns – and with this the demolition of the individual’s right to freedom – also risks leading us into ethical quagmires from which there is no obvious escape.

Jonathan Sumption:

There is a powerful body of medical opinion which would like to see a new relationship between the State and the citizen.

It consists of public health professionals interested only in public health and blind to most things that make good health worth having.

They seem indifferent to mass unemployment, recession and educational disaster. They care not a fig for basic social needs and daily human pleasures.

Hence the present fuss about the Indian variant.

For years, these people have been frustrated by the fact that not everyone shares their priorities or suffers their special brand of tunnel vision.

They have lectured us about being too fat, too thin, not taking enough exercise, or too fond of drink, sugar, tobacco or sunshine for our own good.

We have listened but continued to make our own decisions, not always to their liking.

With Covid-19, these health fascists have come into their own. They have had a chance to strut across the stage, giving us orders rather than just advice. They have welcomed a world in which experts can compel us to do what they regard as good for us.

But their vision of what is good for us is a wretched thing: a narrow, colourless and impoverished vision with little room for human fellowship, culture or any of the collective activities that give value to our lives.

They never ask themselves whether the risk of living with Covid may be better than the certainty of distress, impoverishment and destruction provoked by their plan for suppressing it.

They must suppress risk, even if it means suppressing life itself.

Every day, some professor is wheeled out on radio or TV to say we should have even less liberty, in order to serve their joyless agenda.

Freddie Sayers (emphases added for those of you who doubt the reality of Covid Derangement Syndrome):

Zoom out and the astonishing political fact of the Covid era, the thing that analysts will ponder for decades, is how a nominally libertarian Tory Prime Minister so easily confined his citizens to their homes for so long. Even today, when we have some of the lowest Covid rates in the world and more than 70% of adults have been vaccinated, it is still illegal for a family of four to have three friends over for tea.

Michigan strongwoman Gretchen Whitmer is not only a tyrant, but also a hypocrite. A slice:

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer issued an apology Sunday after a photo emerged showing her at a restaurant with 12 other people gathered around tables pushed together in violation of her health department’s current epidemic order.

John Tamny imagines 2020 without Fauci and the rest of the American covidocracy.

TANSTAFPFC (There Ain’t No Such Thing As Free Protection From Covid.) Really, there isn’t.

Noah Carl: “Taking the average of 2019 and 2020, Sweden had lower mortality than both Denmark and Finland.”

Jay Bhattacharya understandably doesn’t “understand this impetus to vaccinate children.”