… is from page 223 of Art Carden’s and GMU Econ alum Caleb Fuller’s superb book, Mere Economics [original emphasis; footnotes deleted; link added]:
The “finite resources” argument also begs the question because it assumes we know which materials are “resources” and which are not. Something is only a resource insofar as we can use it to satisfy wants, and we figure this out through long processes of trial and error. Oil was just land-running sludge until we figured out how to use it. Here’s economist Michael Munger’s useful test: if people will pay you for it, it’s a resource. If you have to pay someone to take it, it’s garbage. Without private property rights and exchange-promoting rules, we can’t know which is which.


The “finite resources” argument also begs the question because it assumes we know which materials are “resources” and which are not. Something is only a resource insofar as we can use it to satisfy wants, and we figure this out through long processes of trial and error. Oil was just land-running sludge until we figured out how to use it. Here’s economist
