Frederic Bastiat possessed an unsurpassed, and seldom matched, talent for seeing to the heart, the fallacious essence, of protectionist arguments. Consider this passage from Chapter Four of his book Economic Harmonies:
We can give the general name of obstacle to everything that, coming between our wants and our satisfactions, calls forth our efforts.
The interrelations of these four elements—want, obstacle, effort,
satisfaction—are perfectly evident and understandable in the case of
man in a state of isolation. Never, never in the world, would it occur
to us to say:
"It is too bad that Robinson Crusoe does not encounter more obstacles;
for, in that case, he would have more outlets for his efforts; he would
be richer.
"It is too bad that the sea has cast up on the shore of the Isle of
Despair useful articles, boards, provisions, arms, books; for it
deprives Robinson Crusoe of an outlet for his efforts; he is poorer.
"It is too bad that Robinson Crusoe has invented nets to catch fish or
game; for it lessens by that much the efforts he exerts for a given
result; he is less rich.
"It is too bad that Robinson Crusoe is not sick oftener. It would give
him the chance to practice medicine on himself, which is a form of
labor; and, since all wealth comes from labor, he would be richer.
"It is too bad that Robinson Crusoe succeeded in putting out the fire
that endangered his cabin. He has lost an invaluable opportunity for
labor; he is less rich.
"It is too bad that the land on the Isle of Despair is not more barren,
the spring not farther away, the sun not below the horizon more of the
time. Robinson Crusoe would have more trouble providing himself with
food, drink, light; he would be richer."
Never, I say, would people advance such absurd propositions as oracles
of truth. It would be too completely evident that wealth does not
consist in the amount of effort required for each satisfaction
obtained, but that the exact opposite is true. We should understand
that value does not consist in the want or the obstacle or the effort,
but in the satisfaction; and we should readily admit that although
Robinson Crusoe is both producer and consumer, in order to gauge his
progress, we must look, not at his labor, but at its results. In brief,
in stating the axiom that the paramount interest is that of the
consumer, we should feel that we were simply stating a veritable truism.
How happy will nations be when they see clearly how and why what we
find false and what we find true of man in isolation continue to be
false or true of man in society!



Podcast RSS Feed
Full EconTalk Text





{ 7 comments }
I agree. About five years ago I did a commencement address for one university called the Two Freds – where I discussed Bastiat and Hayek. Bastiat made the great story about opportunity cost with his analogy on broken windows. He had a wonderful sense of humor that conveyed a lot about important principles of economics. It is a shame that his work is not read more often.
Great post Dr. Boudreaux. I'm also a big fan of Bastiat. So much wisdom from so long ago, and so many ignore it. ;-(
I agree with drtaxsacto. It would be nice to read more Bastiat and probably should be included in college courses. Its very important to include the Hayek's, Buchanan's and Friedman's, but to go to a less sought after source could really make a student feel unique in his studies.
Excellent passage. Another thing that Marx had muddled!
My favorite is the Candlemaker's Petition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candlemakers%27_petition
It was a copy of "The Law" that inspired me to study economics and brought me to my love of free markets. It amazes me that there is no print collection of Bastiat's works. His pointed common sense can't be argued against.
Liberty Fund is preparing now the collected works of Frederic Bastiat, due out probably in 2007 or 2008.
The Foundation for Economic Education also has most of Bastiat's works available in English-language translations.