Rossputin’s Ross Kaminsky e-mailed to me a few links that offer yet further evidence that “peak oil” is peak nonsense. For example:
And this:
And this:
Oh, and don’t miss this superb letter in today’s Wall Street Journal:
Patience Wheatcroft argues that “peak oil—the point at which global production reaches its maximum—is no more than five years away.” (Agenda Europe, “The Next Crisis: Prepare for Peak Oil,” Feb. 11) In fact, peak oil has been five years away for decades.
So far, despite the gloomy prophecies on resource exhaustion, not only oil, but every other resource has become, on average, more abundant, not more scarce. Such increasing abundance is reflected—in the long run—in decreasing real prices. We have enough oil below the ground to focus on more urgent and less permanent “crises.”
Moreover, Ms. Wheatcroft might consider that nuclear power—a reliable and clean energy source—is not a substitute for oil, as the former can only be used for electricity generation, while the latter is mostly used for transport and petrochemicals. Buying into the peak oil myth is a poor service to the cause of nuclear power.
Carlo Stagnaro
Milan